Get Better Gear!

Premier Sponsors

TechRestore

Other World Computing

Top 5 Free Apps

Release Date: August 05, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: May 22, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: August 29, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: March 27, 2009
Release Date: August 07, 2009

iTunes New Music Releases

Release Date: September 29, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: September 20, 2009
Release Date: September 15, 2009
Release Date: August 25, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: August 25, 2009

Top 5 Paid Apps

Release Date: April 22, 2009
StickWars $0.99
Release Date: March 31, 2009
Genre: Games
Bloons $0.99
Release Date: April 05, 2009
Genre: Games

Discover New Music

  • Jagged Little Pill (Acoustic)

    • 6 out of 10
    • Alanis Morissette
    • Ten years after the original release, comes the traditional celebratory acoustic re-recording. The album has held up remarkably well. While it is not as meaningful to me as it was when I was sixteen,
  • King James Version

    • 4 out of 10
    • Harvey Danger
    • The sophomore effort from Harvey Danger, I was really looking forward to this followup to "Where Have All the Merrymakers Gone?" Unfortunately, "King James Version" failed to deliver any of the bri

  • Plans

    • 8 out of 10
    • Death Cab for Cutie
    • With the introduction of Plans, Death Cab for Cutie became a new addition to many user's Artist list after the single "Soul Meets Body" became a hit on iTunes. Offering a fresh alternativ

  • Supermodified

    • 10 out of 10
    • Amon Tobin
    • The genius is in the beats. Amon Tobin creates fantastic, groovy beats behind beats. "Supermodified" rolls through your expectations of breakbeat music, and turns them up a bit. It's a mellow album, p
  • Now Here Is Nowhere

    • 10 out of 10
    • Secret Machines
    • The Secret Machines' inaugural album, Now Here is Nowhere is both old and new in its sonic assault. The trio's surprisingly big sound evokes Pink Floyd (without ever sounding like any Pink

Reader Specials

Visit Deals On The Web for the best deals on all consumer electronics, iPods, and more!

News

Supreme Court Strikes Blow Against Grokster, Says Cable Cos. May Keep Rival ISPs Off Lines

The Supreme Court on Monday issued a pair of rulings that will affect many Internet users, according to two Associated Press stories. In one ruling, it said that a trial against such file-sharing services as Grokster may proceed, given that those services' primary use is the illegal distribution of music, movies and other digital content. In another ruling, the justices decided that, unlike phone companies, cable providers don't need to share their lines with rivals offering broadband Internet service.

The Grokster case was a unanimous decision in which Justice David H. Souter wrote: "We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by the clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties," noted reporter Hope Yen.

Two lower courts had used a 1984 Supreme Court decision in favor of Sony as the basis for their rulings. Sony had been sued by Hollywood studios that argued VCRs would be used to make illegal copies of movies, an argument rejected by Supreme Court justices who decided that the company couldn't be held liable for its customers' actions. The current Supreme Court, however, ignored warnings that the lawsuits could hamper the development of such technology as the iPod and decided that Grokster and other peer-to-peer file-sharing services hold a greater degree of liability.

Ms. Yen also quoted Mr. Souter as writing: "There is substantial evidence in MGM's favor on all elements of inducement," meaning that Grokster's technology should also be looked at by the way it's marketed and whether the company tries to reduce copyright infringement by its users.

The other decision, which was also reported on by Ms. Yen, was a 6-3 ruling that keeps cable broadband lines from being considered in the same light as phone lines, which must be shared for DSL, long distance and local calling, and other services. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, said that final say in the matter should lie with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which decided in March 2002 to label cable lines an "information service" different from phone lines.

With over 19 million homes connected to the Internet through cable broadband services, accounting for 60% of those who use high-speed Internet access, cable companies won't have to share lines the way phone companies have to allow Earthlink and other ISPs onto their lines. Ms. Yen reported that phone companies will now lobby the FCC to apply the same standard to their lines.

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me  Forgot your password?

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.