News

Hesseldahl: 'Why Apple Won't Up-Charge Downloads'

BusinessWeek's Arik Hesseldahl writes in his latest "Byte of the Apple" column: "Record execs are clamoring for price flexibility in music downloads, but Steve Jobs is adamant that 99 cents per song is perfect. The war of words that erupted last week ... served to drive home how much the music industry has changed, and how much its executives still have to learn about what those changes mean."

Last week, Warner Music CEO Edgar Bronfman responded to Mr. Jobs' comment that the record industry is "greedy" for wanting to raise iTunes Music Store prices by saying: "There's no content in the world that doesn't have some price flexibility. Not all songs are created equal. Not all albums are created equal."

Mr. Hesseldahl looks at the variety of pricing found in other media, such as books and magazines, and notes that "in principle, Bronfman may be right." And while Mr. Jobs believes that higher prices will mean a return to illegal music downloading for many consumers, the columnist points to research conducted by Ipsos/Insight that shows consumers would be willing to pay as much as US$1.29 per song.

However, Mr. Hesseldahl sees the iPod nano as "Apple's knockout punch." He expects the company to dismiss the idea of more iTunes-capable cell phones and keep its focus on the iPod. And with Apple gobbling up a large piece of the available flash memory, it will be "difficult for competitors making flash-memory-based players that work with other music services to get their products on the shelves this holiday season," he writes.

That turn of events will further solidify Apple's already-entrenched position, giving Mr. Jobs the upper hand and leaving the record industry unable to push through a price increase. "Jobs will get what Jobs wants," writes Mr. Hesseldahl.

11 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Rainy Day said:

member since 07 Jun 2005 with 607 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Go Steve, go!

Quote this post ↓

Tiger said:

member since 17 Jun 2003 with 950 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Somebody finally got the upper hand on the music industry...and they were complicit all along.

Ain't it grand?

Quote this post ↓

burrito said:

member since 07 Aug 2005 with 176 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

record executives can eat $#!% and die for all i care... the prices they are demanding on music is theivery, and, as steve jobs would say, theves burn in hell.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

burrito wrote:
Mac fans can eat $#!% and live in a national park for all i care... the prices they are demanding on music is robbing music labels, and, as steve jobs would say, "This is the greatest thing we've ever made."

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The price for a song should be going down not up.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

i don't see why they are crying about! go steve go! its not like they protect the artiste, they are just protecting their own damn pockets

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Kudos to Steve. Whether by design or accident, commanding the market enables him to command the pricing. What is significant is that Steve has the long-term view to stabilize pricing and return a fair profit to artists and producers.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Variable pricing does have a place, but it could also kill the nascent music download business.

Either that, or the record execs and musicians are just too used to the profits that fuel their drug habits.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

spitting out mindless garbage.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Guest wrote:
The price for a song should be going down not up.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Guest wrote:
The price for a song will be listed on a Texas Holdem site.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.