You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Apple Introduces iPod HiFi Stereo [UPDATED]

News

Apple Introduces iPod HiFi Stereo [UPDATED]

Apple CEO Steve Jobs on Tuesday morning also took the wraps off iPod HiFi, a stereo that features a dock connection, built-in handles and 80mm mid-range drivers, along with a 130mm dual voice coil woofer. It comes in a sealed resin enclosure and can be powered by six D-cell batteries, or through its built-in power supply.

"We get great bass on this thing, and it doesn't distort when you turn it up," Mr. Jobs said during his demonstration. The iPod HiFi comes with an Apple Remote for controlling song selection and the volume, and it charges the iPod through the dock connector. There's also a port for an iPod shuffle, as well as a 3.5mm auxiliary input for connecting to analog or digital audio sources.

Apple on Tuesday also released an iPod software update that adds a "Speaker" menu to the MP3 player's interface. Through that menu, users can adjust tone, control the backlight and turn on large album art. Tone control and large album art are available only on the iPod nano and 5G video iPod.

iPod HiFi is available now for US$349. It's compatible with any iPod that has a dock connector; it includes 10 Universal Dock adapters.


iPod HiFi

2:16 PM EST: Updated article with more information and a photo

28 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

Someone who hangs around The IPodObserver predicted a boom box, good call. I have been shopping to replace my "That '70s Show" era stereo amp, I am going to take a good look at this iPod HiFi.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Was that a joke? That was hardly worth Steve coming into work for . . . . they should have had some intern bury that hi-fi page on the web site overnight. What a dud.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Not really a boom box since carrying it around with your ipod wobbling around on top isn't very practical. So, it's portable, but not playble as you port it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

This actually looks quite good. A mini, airtunes and ipod hifi would really make me very happy.

Maybe now's the time to digitize all my LP's, give away my B&W speakers and bury my overkill 70's preamp and amp. Being a bit of a hifi freak is all good and well, but when my daughter decided to redesign my Dynaco equipment, the only feeling I had was "what a relief she didn't get killed by those huge voltages that machine harnasses".

That gave me a clue that my audiophile days were counted. Now all I can think of when I look at my (excellent) equipment is "what a waste of space", and truth be told, you can find rather cheap(ish) alternatives with the same or better specs, less hum and a lot less danger to kids with great ideas...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

A boom box without an FM Tuner? At $300+ I would expect an FM Tuner as well as the ability to record those tunes directly to the docked iPod! Sheesh

Quote this post ↓

davebarnes said:

member since 12 Jan 2005 with 130 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

To the guest who wrote: "give away my B&W speakers",

Please contact me and I will gladly receive them.

,dave

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Does it include a recharge circuit for the (rechargeable) D-cell batteries to keep them topped off for when you can to carry it somewhere?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I'm disappointed in the iPod Hifi, specifically the lack of a display, clock or radio. And I find the design ugly, with those awful handles. At least they covered the speakers with a cover. I guess even Ive sometimes swings and misses. It may sound great, but it's not visually attractive.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Wow. That was a pretty weak announcement. I see why the stock is down 2 points.

Quote this post ↓

mahuti said:

member since 09 Jan 2003 with 377 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Super lame. Super weak. The i-Fusion is better. WAYY better. That thing is just a weird gimmick.

Quote this post ↓

tbone1 said:

member since 13 Jul 2001 with 3981 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Bleargh. It looks uglier than our Klipsch iGroove, and somehow I'd expect the Klipsch to sound better.

At about $70 cheaper, no less ...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Wow! What a complete and utter letdown. Totally failed to come close to meeting expectations.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Giving away speakers... Um, sorry, should have added "to a friend who has the space"... Haven't totally gone bonkers

Quote this post ↓

stuartea said:

member since 08 Aug 2005 with 327 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

You'd think putting an AirPort in the thing would've made sense, rather than having to plug it into an AirPort Express.

An internal hard drive (making the whole thing a big AirPort/backup) would've been good too.

Quote this post ↓

dynamicv said:

member since 06 May 2004 with 51 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Agree with stuartes. The only big omission here is the lack of Wi-Fi in the Hi-Fi. I'll wait until I hear one to pass judgement, but with Wi-Fi I could have seen myself getting a couple of these for my home office.

Wireless speakers on the shelves behind my desk would have been great. But not if I have to either cable across the room or buy an Airport Express for each of them. It's just not an elegant solution.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Bad price point too. At $299, it might fly, but $349, even for audiophile quality? Nope.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

This thing is proof positive that Apple needs to keep to what it knows best. Is it me or does this THING look just like all those ugly Satellite radio portable solutions? For $350 bucks, no CD, Tuner, aux input of anykind and the ipod doesnt even lock in the face flush? Forget portability. The least they could do is add an Aux input so this THING could be used as a portable music amp. Heck my $250 kaboom box has that! And I can play my ipod on it while the ipod fits neatly in the pouch on the carrying strap. Sometimes pratical is better than different. Sometimes its good to get mad at the ones you love.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

forgive me, I see it does have a 3.5mm aux in, I'm still behind the fence on this one.

Quote this post ↓

MOSiX Man said:

member since 20 Jun 2001 with 558 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

[rant]

Would (most of) you people PUHLEASE quit yer' ceaseless whining about how Apple didn't do what you wanted or expected them to do?! You sound like a bunch of primadona rich kids that aren't happy about what your parents got you for christmas, or your doing some serious armchair quarterbacking. If you don't like it, just say that, but STFU about how Apple let you down, what they really 'should' have done if they were as smart as you, or how Apple overhyped this event.

1) Apple sent out a subtle invite to some press, just saying 'check out some fun, new gear we have', not 'OMG, everybody has to wait on baited breath, to see what AWESOME, new stuff we made, that will blow everybodies socks off!!!' So, it was neither over-hyped, nor does anybody have the right to say they were let down. So many weenies take rumor sites at face value and build up massive expectations around Apple's every move, that when Apple fails to come out with something like the world's first human teleporter (or whatever the public and the moronic analysts unjustly expect), it actually negatively affects Apple's stock price. That's not a good thing.

2) Simply put, if you think you can do better than Apple, go ahead and do it. YOU may think that the iPod Hi-Fi is ugly, but I (and plenty of others, I can assure you) think a small, spartan but sleek looking, yet high quality speaker system, that can connect to iPod, is a good thing. Aesthetics is totally subjective.

As far as the suggestion of 'why not build an Airport Express into it'... Lets see... Maybe, some people already HAVE an Airport Express and just want better speakers. Or, maybe the cost of building it in, would have made the unit unmarketable for all the people who just want to use it with an iPod and don't want to pay for wireless. Also, what happens when Apple comes out with an 802.11n-based Airport Express? What if the speakers blow out, due to some unfortunate occurance? Wouldn't it be better to keep the components seperate? The same goes for the CD player and whatever other gizmos. This thing is simply a good, compact, fairly portable set of speakers, with an iPod dock. THAT'S IT. It isn't meant to be an iPod Boom-Box, as some people seem to think. You want components or an Aux input? Then get yourself a tuner and pre-amp, and hook the Hi-Fi into them.

[/rant]

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I bet this is the first product of a iPod Hi-Fi line.

(At least if people buy few of these for starters)

I quess we will see wi-fi models, and radio accessories in future.

And some solution that contains more than one iPod Hi-Fi boxes.

If the prize tag was around 250$, and it had wifi, i could buy a few.

But they would need to be truly multi-purpose devices.

I have to admire apple for one thing. They know how to get people spend 50$ to a radio accessory for a 300$ device. =)

Just thoughs. I do not have insider information. But i know lots of things about consumer product development in general.

Quote this post ↓

dynamicv said:

member since 06 May 2004 with 51 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

MOSiX Man wrote:
[rant]

As far as the suggestion of 'why not build an Airport Express into it'... Lets see... Maybe, some people already HAVE an Airport Express and just want better speakers. Or, maybe the cost of building it in, would have made the unit unmarketable for all the people who just want to use it with an iPod and don't want to pay for wireless.

[/rant]

OK, but why not put an internal slot in the unit to fit an Airport card as an optional extra? What do Airport cards take up these days spacewise? This is a major omission as far as I'm concerned, and as a result Apple have lost two sales.

It would also have made a lot of sense when using these with the new Mac mini "media centre" abilities. It's a lost opportunity to increase how many of these units they ship.

Quote this post ↓

stuartea said:

member since 08 Aug 2005 with 327 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Dear oh dear, glad you got that out? Feeling better? ; )

I think the point of comments is to make 'comments' about the product, wether they're for, against, or anything else.

People commenting on what other things they might've liked to have seen, or think perhaps might be a good idea, doesn't always equate to 'whining'. It doesn't mean they 'hate' the product.

I'm not saying it won't sell.

MOSiX Man wrote:
[rant]

.................

[/rant]

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

dynamicv wrote:
MOSiX Man wrote:
[rant]

...What I said...

[/rant]

OK, but why not put an internal slot in the unit to fit an Airport card as an optional extra? What do Airport cards take up these days spacewise? This is a major omission as far as I'm concerned, and as a result Apple have lost two sales.

It would also have made a lot of sense when using these with the new Mac mini "media centre" abilities. It's a lost opportunity to increase how many of these units they ship.

Nice thought, but a working Airport card expansion slot would necessitate enough built-in hardware and software that you would end up with the equivalent of an Airport Express in there, anyhow. An Airport card has to connect to a logic board of some sort. Remember?

No offense, but this is just the kind of armchair quarterbacking that I was talking about - people making assumptions that Apple could (or worse, should) have done things differently, without knowing or considering (or, in some cases, ignoring) all of the facts.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

stuartea wrote:
Dear oh dear, glad you got that out? Feeling better? ; )

I think the point of comments is to make 'comments' about the product, wether they're for, against, or anything else.

People commenting on what other things they might've liked to have seen, or think perhaps might be a good idea, doesn't always equate to 'whining'. It doesn't mean they 'hate' the product.

I'm not saying it won't sell.

MOSiX Man wrote:
[rant]

...What I said...

[/rant]

OK. So, maybe I got all curmudgeonly, last night. Trust me, I have no problem with people expressing their OPINION about the merits (or lack there of) of a product, service or whatever. That's everybody's right. I just don't care for whining, or especially for people popping off like they know better or could have done better than someone else, when they don't have a shred of an idea what it would actually take to pull off their idea, and don't have the sense to realize that maybe there were good reasons for NOT doing it their way.

I like dynamic discussion, as long as it is well thought out and constructive. Instead of someone saying 'GOD! Apple didn't put tab A into slot B?! How stupid of them. If they had any sense, they would have done that!' How about 'Hmmm... I'm puzzled why Apple didn't put tab A into slot B. Here is why I think that it would have been a good idea. Maybe we'll find out, eventually, why they didn't.'

I hope you can see the difference.

Quote this post ↓

rgshelton said:

member since 17 Jan 2006 with 7 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Anyone find the "iPod software update that adds a "Speaker" menu to the MP3 player's interface"? I've looked at the ipod software download page at Apple and checked software update and still only see the iPod Updater 2006-01-10.

Quote this post ↓

macinnerd said:

member since 15 Jun 2005 with 1748 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote:

OK. So, maybe I got all curmudgeonly, last night. Trust me, I have no problem with people expressing their OPINION about the merits (or lack there of) of a product, service or whatever. That's everybody's right. I just don't care for whining, or especially for people popping off like they know better or could have done better than someone else, when they don't have a shred of an idea what it would actually take to pull off their idea, and don't have the sense to realize that maybe there were good reasons for NOT doing it their way.

I like dynamic discussion, as long as it is well thought out and constructive. Instead of someone saying 'GOD! Apple didn't put tab A into slot B?! How stupid of them. If they had any sense, they would have done that!' How about 'Hmmm... I'm puzzled why Apple didn't put tab A into slot B. Here is why I think that it would have been a good idea. Maybe we'll find out, eventually, why they didn't.'

I hope you can see the difference.

I'm assuming that's you, MOSiX Man.

Quote this post ↓

dynamicv said:

member since 06 May 2004 with 51 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Guest wrote:

Nice thought, but a working Airport card expansion slot would necessitate enough built-in hardware and software that you would end up with the equivalent of an Airport Express in there, anyhow. An Airport card has to connect to a logic board of some sort. Remember?

The Hi-Fi already does have a logic board of some sort, otherwise the iPod connector wouldn't do anything other than charge the iPod's battery. To control the optional card would probably mean extending the logic board by enough to accomodate a single controller/converter chip, and running an Airport antenna inside the case. The plug-in card would then identify itself to the streaming computer by means of it's MAC address (ha ha). The controller chips only function would be to convert incoming streamed audio and pass it to the speaker.

That's way simpler than an Airport Express, which has to act as router, wireless switch and signal converter. Even if you encrypt the streamed signal with a WEP/WPA key, you have a front-end program on your Mac/PC that takes it from your network settings, then sends the key once. The chances of someone war-driving at that moment are extremely low, and from that point on, the speaker is just another host on your encrypted network and your stream is secure. The program could even be written to configure multiple speakers at once to further lessen the risk.

This would probably add about $3 to the basic production cost of each speaker unit, and certainly wouldn't mean it had to increase in size. Optional cards would retail for $50. It's so obvious I'm truly amazed that it's not been included.

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2088 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

dynamicv wrote:
The Hi-Fi already does have a logic board of some sort, otherwise the iPod connector wouldn't do anything other than charge the iPod's battery. To control the optional card would probably mean extending the logic board by enough to accomodate a single controller/converter chip, and running an Airport antenna inside the case. The plug-in card would then identify itself to the streaming computer by means of it's MAC address (ha ha). The controller chips only function would be to convert incoming streamed audio and pass it to the speaker.

Nope. The iPod dock connector includes an analog line-out signal. That's what the iTrip, AirPlay, etc. use. You can even get a dock connector (the PocketDock) that has a line out jack as well as a USB or FireWire jack. Thus, the iPod HiFi does not need a logic board to convert a digital to analog signal. The other pins on the dock connector allow for the remote operation and charging. I don't know if the iPod even has a digital sound output. So far, no third-party manufacturer has made a device that would use such an output.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.