You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: iTunes Not Going Subscription with Multi-Pass

News

iTunes Not Going Subscription with Multi-Pass

After Tuesday's introduction of the Multi-Pass at the iTunes Music Store (iTMS), several news sources have erroneously reported that Apple is joining the ranks of Napster and RealNetworks by launching a subscription-based service. Multi-Pass is actually a pre-paid discount that lets customers purchase a set number of downloadable TV episodes before they are available at the iTMS.

Multi-Pass was launched simultaneously with the addition of Comedy Central's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and The Colbert Report. Users can purchase a Multi-Pass to either show for US$9.99 and receive the next 16 episodes just as if they had purchased them individually, but at a substantial discount off the $31.84 they would cost if purchased one at a time.

Just like any other song, video, or TV show purchased at the iTMS, programs purchased through a Multi-Pass download to your computer and remain playable without requiring you to pay any additional fees.

Unlike the iTMS purchase model, Napster and RealNetworks offer customers a subscription-based model that requires users to pay a monthly fee to continue to listen to their music. Although big label recording companies are pressuring Apple to change the iTMS to a subscription service and charge higher prices, Apple is resisting the move.

Apple sells individual songs at the iTMS for $0.99 each, and videos and TV shows for $1.99 each.

10 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

bryson said:

member since 05 Mar 2002 with 79 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Of course they erroneously reported it. That's because the media doesn't do any research, they just hear something, some rumor, some snippet of information and do this knee-jerk reactionary reporting just to get the story out there before someone else rather than looking into the facts.

Especially true in teh area of technology.

Makes you wonder what else they are reporting incorrectly.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

This morning CBS business news reported that Apple is "experimenting" with subscription service. I went to their web site, but after drilling around I could not find the story so I could quote it for a complaint. Maybe I will just stop fooling around and switch to Fox News and stop worrying about accuracy.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I disagree, bryson. The media do a lot of research. It's the only way they can be so consistently wrong. Otherwise, they'd sometimes be right by sheer dumb luck.

Indeed, seeing the amount of BS they say about technology, it makes you doubt on the accuracy of the rest on their content. It's exactly how I feel about the Swiss newspaper 'Le Temps'. I always found it kinda sad that the best technology articles I could find in a non specialised medium was in the TV guide.

Quote this post ↓

rgshelton said:

member since 17 Jan 2006 with 7 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

It may not be a subscription, but it's a good idea and I hope Apple convinces the network types to do this for other shows. I for one would never pay as much as they want for a season of a show at the resolution they offer it at. It's almost the price of a DVD set for most of the offerings. $10-$15 for a season, that's more reasonable. Same reason I'll buy an "album" from itunes for $9.99 if the CD is $17.99 everywhere else. If I can get it for $12.99 from Amazon or Best Buy, I'll do that. I would imagine sales of entire seasons are not as brisk as they would have hoped.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Getting accuracy from Fox News? That made me bust my gut.

jr

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

<plug="shameless">

We saw this one coming. Read yesterday's RandomMaccess: "RandomMaccess Analysis: Reuters gets it wrong in iTMS 'Multi-Pass' analogy"

[http://www.randommaccess.com/articles/1141852404.shtml]

</plug>

--

Chuck La Tournous

Editor.Publisher, RandomMaccess.com

Quote this post ↓

MOSiX Man said:

member since 20 Jun 2001 with 558 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Leelu Dallas...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Now that I think about, Apple did launch a "subscription" service, just like a magazine subscription. You agree to get the next bunch of whatever for a specific period and pay up front for it.

Which begs the questions: Why the hell do these "RENTAL" music companies get away with calling their service a subscription?

When I cancel a magazine subscription, I don't have to return the magazines!

Quote this post ↓

Rainy Day said:

member since 07 Jun 2005 with 607 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

bryson wrote:
Makes you wonder what else they are reporting incorrectly.

Everything?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

You're right, some people misunderstood Multi-Pass as a subscription service. But that doesn't mean there might not be an Apple Movie Store subscription service coming in the near future. Even though Steve Jobs seems set against the model, what would be wrong with a Netflix-like service offered thru iTunes? They have the necessary DRM in place on both PC's and Mac's. I wrote up more on this here:

http://scottsviewport.blogspot.com/2006/03/prediction-movie-download-not-movie.html

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.