News

Microsoft Confirms it Originated iPod Box Parody Video

Microsoft spokesman Tom Pilla on Tuesday confirmed with iPod Observer that his company initiated the creation of the iPod packaging parody video that was first reported last month. "It was an internal-only video clip commissioned by our packaging [team] to humorously highlight the challenges we have faced RE: packaging and to educate marketers here about the pitfalls of packaging/branding," he said via e-mail.

The video, which surfaced on You Tube but has since been removed and can now be found on Google Video, pokes fun at Microsoft's tendency toward cluttered packaging by imagining how the company would have designed the box for the original iPod. Where Apple's design is sparse, Microsoft's final creation is full of so many stickers and other information that the photo of the MP3 player can be barely seen.

Mr. Pilla noted: "While MS did not release the video, it's natural to share funny things with friends. So while we didn't publicly share the video, it was shared with appropriate teams internally. We're happy to see others enjoy the laugh as well."


Apple's iPod box vs. Microsoft's version

3/14/06, 2:51 PM EST: Updated with link to clip at Google Video. Thanks to iPod Observer reader DeepDish.

91 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Small White Car said:

member since 02 Jul 2004 with 1937 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Wow...so that's why it looked so real.

So they, uh...were making fun of themselves? I guess the people who make the boxes are being told what to put there by higher-up managers and they don't like it any more than we do! Nice to see they have a sense of humor about it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

That means someone at Microsoft was paid to create that. That's golden!

Quote this post ↓

stuartea said:

member since 08 Aug 2005 with 326 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

They do have a sense of humour : )

Quote this post ↓

Mav said:

member since 17 Oct 2003 with 1090 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

As long as no one gets fired, it's all in good fun.

Quote this post ↓

mrmgraphics said:

member since 05 Sep 2003 with 824 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

+

Now the question is: How does anyone get a copy of it? Surely soomeone out there in the vastness of the Internet has a copy, just like a few websites had the never-aired second Ellen Feiss Switcher commercial a few years ago.

Quote this post ↓

DeepDish said:

member since 25 Jun 2001 with 57 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I have seen it on video.google.com or is it videos.google.com?

Anyway, I have seen it there.

Quote this post ↓

DeepDish said:

member since 25 Jun 2001 with 57 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

They probably did that video as a true mockup and then switched their story to "It was supposed to be funny." after they saw the reaction around the 'net. Heh!

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Heh, well played, Microsoft, Well played indeed!

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Wow! This response from MS reminds me of a time when I saw Donald Rumsfield actually laugh during a news briefing. It was really scary -- it actually made him appear to be human. Not to worry, I'm sure the appropriate heads will roll over this one, though they really should be promoted. Maybe they will -- start working for Apple, as obviously they've been infected by the Mac virus -- they think different. Good play all the way around by the packaging/marketing guys -- show what fixes need to be made, then instead of running to hide and CYA'ing when they've obviously been caught with their pants down, own up to it. Big thumbs up for Microsoft. At least their product packaging/marketing division. At least one department is starting to 'get it'.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

In all seriousness though can you seriously think a company that responded with such pique when workers were found to be flashing their iPods on campus would see this as simply a bit of a laugh. I think not, I suspect people are being hung, drawn and quartered this very minute, at least metaphorically speaking the actual process is probably being confounded by a blue screen of death in the torture chamber at present. After all, judging by the spookily similar plan for marketing at least 6 versions of Vista at the last count it is obvious that irony isnt a quality the powers that be at Microsoft fully understand.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The original video can be found here:

http://arctic.org/~patrick/misc/ms-ipod-parody-real.wmv

This is the true first encoding of the video. It's much better quality than the re-compressed versions from YouTube and Google Video.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

> I think not, I suspect people are being hung, drawn and quartered this very minute, at least metaphorically speaking the actual process is probably being confounded by a blue screen of death in the torture chamber at present.

Jeez. Get a life. Microsoft has a long tradition of making funny videos about itself. Here's one of the newer ones: http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2679657?htv=12

> After all, judging by the spookily similar plan for marketing at least 6 versions of Vista at the last count it is obvious that irony isnt a quality the powers that be at Microsoft fully understand.

Yeah, because marketing software == marketing an mp3 player. Not. And before you forget, Microsoft has been _far_ more successful at marketing software than Apple.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

This video is really well made. Obviously they've used Microsoft® Windows Movie Maker™®©

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I thought it was funny, and it made me feel a little better about MS. People who can laugh at themselves can't be all bad. For some of the above comments, I agree with the sentiment, "Get a life."

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Genious!

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

its iPod not I-pod

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Not sure if you realize this, but I'm almost 100% certain that nothing is leaked from MS unless they want it to be.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Etherdog writes:

Use http://keepvid.com/ do download any vid on the net. Easy, free. Almost Mac like.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
its iPod not I-pod

yeah obviously retard! its spelled crappy because it's MICRO$OFT, the way Apple spelled it looks too good for microsoft

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

That is so awesome! I actually liked the redesign more than the original. Awesome.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

for those of you who might want to download this funny video go to:

http://keepvid.com/

and enter:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=36099539665548298&q

it'll give you links to download either .avi, .mov, .flv or .mp4's of the video....

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

by the way, I tested the keepvid .mp4 and it played just fine. I haven't downloaded the other formats....

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I am STILL wondering what the track is that plays during the video. Can anyone ID it? Thanks!!

Quote this post ↓

BradC said:

member since 29 Apr 2005 with 80 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

"I am STILL wondering what the track is that plays during the video. Can anyone ID it? Thanks!!"

I read elsewhere that it is from Danny Elfman's score from one of the Pee Wee movies.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
BradC wrote:
"I am STILL wondering what the track is that plays during the video. Can anyone ID it? Thanks!!"

I read elsewhere that it is from Danny Elfman's score from one of the Pee Wee movies.

it's called Breakfast Machine and it is indeed by Danny Elfman, from Pee Wee's Big Adventure

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

prolly means the microsoft programmers were making fun of ms marketting. the usual engineer/non-engineer clique environment at most large companies.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

As a Microsoftie, I cracked up with my colleagues when I first saw this video. It's funny because it's true.

Microsoft is innately human, I've gotta say...we're waaaa-ay more critical of ourselves than anyone out there. Believe me when I say that. Self critical is a way of life here. It's part of what pushes us to be the best. We don't always succeed, to be sure, but we sure as heck try.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

As a graphic designer who has worked with inept management (they are nearly all are), i can say that it was obvious that came from a frustrated designer(s). there are no other kind. it really is design 101 in video form. I applaud the bitch slap their packing team was able to deliver to marketing. To Quote Battlestar Gallactica, So say We All.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The fact that Microsoft commissioned this, coupled with the halo that appears over the unmolested iPod box is a tribute to the fact that there really are some brilliant people at Microsoft. To think that this was built "for fun" is ridiculous. Microsoft is all business and what you see here is a creative way to highlight what a different (and obviously very successful) marketing strategy looks like. They're telling their people "learn from this". I imagine it won't be long before we start seeing packaging from Microsoft that is substantially less cluttered and with that will undoubtedly come a better overall marketplace perception of their products (a confused customer is an unhappy customer after all). The mantra in the high technology business is "adapt or die"... This is exactly what Microsoft is doing and I (as a long time Apple user) applaud and encourage them.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The real truth is this explans how people at Microsoft really think. MS has so much money for R&D and still comes us short next to Apple. it always amazes me the wealth of talent they may have but don't use. its all about the marketing people. MS will never be Apple no matter hard they try. they just don't think outside the box. the culture there is taught not too. Don't rock the boat we need the profits.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

MS has a sense of humor . . .

Really.

http://msexp.streamnavig.com/msexp/player_extract.asp?e=E9999&s=9999_en_xw&f=9999_en&uid=00000000&lng=uk&cou=uk

Just don't tell the Redmond management team.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

To say that "MS will always come up short to Apple" and "MS will never be Apple no matter how hard they try" must be one of the most asinine statements I have ever read on the internet. Bill Gates did not become THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD without being an innovator, to say that MS has not (been an innovator) is just plain ignoring the facts. Apple had a small hardcore niche market until the iPod sparked people's interest in them again. No one can doubt Apple makes solid products that have a growing following, no one can doubt the quality of the iPod or any of their products but to attribute all of the sucess to Steve Jobs himself is idiocy, hundreds if not thousands of people contributed to the success of Apple's products. Also concerning "thinking outside of the box", Apple is the box now, they made a great product and now it is everyone's goal to make a better one. Someday someone will create a new product that will "Make Apple look like MS", no one is number one forever.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
To say that "MS will always come up short to Apple" and "MS will never be Apple no matter how hard they try" must be one of the most asinine statements I have ever read on the internet. Bill Gates did not become THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD without being an innovator, to say that MS has not (been an innovator) is just plain ignoring the facts. Apple had a small hardcore niche market until the iPod sparked people's interest in them again. No one can doubt Apple makes solid products that have a growing following, no one can doubt the quality of the iPod or any of their products but to attribute all of the sucess to Steve Jobs himself is idiocy, hundreds if not thousands of people contributed to the success of Apple's products. Also concerning "thinking outside of the box", Apple is the box now, they made a great product and now it is everyone's goal to make a better one. Someday someone will create a new product that will "Make Apple look like MS", no one is number one forever.

Wow. Revisionist History 101.

Not to start a war or anything, but can you name three things that Microsoft innovated? (Do not include anything bought, copied, or stolen.)

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

MS DOS

The bluescreen

Frustration

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
MS DOS

The bluescreen

Frustration

Nope !!!

MS - DOS was bought in.

Quote this post ↓

LaurieF said:

member since 15 Jun 2001 with 3468 posts, TMO Forum Mod, send him a message or view his profile

SQL Server was developed in collaboration with Sybase, and then split off as its own product around version 7.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Microsoft Bob.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Clippy!

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
They probably did that video as a true mockup and then switched their story to "It was supposed to be funny." after they saw the reaction around the 'net. Heh!

And why would MS do a true mockup of an Ipod box? Do you perhaps think that MS makes the Ipod?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Not sure if you realize this, but I'm almost 100% certain that nothing is leaked from MS unless they want it to be.

You're right, I didn't realize that some random dumb and illiterate pustule was almost 100% certain of that.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Bill Gates did not become THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD without being an innovator, to say that MS has not (been an innovator) is just plain ignoring the facts.

The facts are that theft, strongarming, payola, etc. pay big.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Brilliant and funny. My respect for MS just went up a notch or two.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

How appropriate that MS used <i>Breakfast Machine</i> by Danny Elfman, from Pee Wee's Big Adventure - a rip-off sound-alike from Nino Rota/Fellini films.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Guest said: "Brilliant and funny. My respect for MS just went up a notch or two."

You need an antibiotic: http://www.theregister.co.uk/media/578.mpeg

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Bill Gates did not become THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD without being an innovator, to say that MS has not (been an innovator) is just plain ignoring the facts,,,,

"All great fortunes begin with a great crime" (or something like that) Voltare

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
its iPod not I-pod

yeah obviously retard! its spelled crappy because it's MICRO$OFT, the way Apple spelled it looks too good for microsoft

I'm thinking it's got a hyphen because iPod has a copyright on it. Microsoft wouldn't want to infringe on another companies copyrights.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
its iPod not I-pod
yeah obviously retard! its spelled crappy because it's MICRO$OFT, the way Apple spelled it looks too good for microsoft

I'm thinking it's got a hyphen because iPod has a copyright on it. Microsoft wouldn't want to infringe on another companies copyrights.

Not to mention they're referring to how they'd spell it.

-Jonn

Quote this post ↓

BradC said:

member since 29 Apr 2005 with 80 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
its iPod not I-pod

yeah obviously retard! its spelled crappy because it's MICRO$OFT, the way Apple spelled it looks too good for microsoft

I'm thinking it's got a hyphen because iPod has a copyright on it. Microsoft wouldn't want to infringe on another companies copyrights.

Apple has a trademark on iPod, not a copyright. (You trademark logos and names, you copyright books, movies, etc.)

As for whether or not Microsoft changed the spelling because of trademark issues, who knows? While it was for internal use, I'd bet there was an expectation that it would probably be leaked because it's so funny. In that case, someone may have been concerned that Apple would crack down on Microsoft for trademark infringement, although court rulings have shown that trademarks can be infringed for satirical purposes, as long as said purposes are limited in nature. (See DC Comics vs. Mad Magazine in the 1950s, when the precedent was set.)

However, MS may have simply wanted to avoid any legal issues by changing the name.

Then again, spelling it that way may have been another comment on the way MS tends to overcomplicate matters. Why use a hyphen when you don't need one, right?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
I imagine it won't be long before we start seeing packaging from Microsoft that is substantially less cluttered and with that will undoubtedly come a better overall marketplace perception of their products (a confused customer is an unhappy customer after all).

You mean like their Mac Office packaging? That was a whole lot less cluttered then their Windows equivalent. It was so uncluttered on their Office Xv box, they even decided to cut half the face out of it. ; )

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Kudos to whomever is responsible for this Video which just made my day much better. Funny stuff, they deserve a cookie!

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

i think it's fuuny the person who wrote genius...spelled it GENIOUS..pure genius comment.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I find it funny how anal-expulsive some folks are about their politics, but let me just say that Rummy is far more successful both in terms of promulgating ideology ("Old Europe", combat readiness, military modernization) and of sucesses where people's lives are on the line, than any armchair general. Don't bother with the facts, though, enjoy the air in your closet of leftist flatulation.

Now, on to the video at hand. It's hardly surprising that designers are going to take on marketing. That happens everywhere. What the M$ rep said was a nice PR cover, but are there heads rolling? No doubt. If you've read up on M$ corporate culture, it'd be hard to believe that there wouldn't be retaliation. Honestly, M$ is no Apple -- the corporate DNA is wholly different.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Just shows that Microsoft and Apple are ENTIRELY different types of companies.

Jobs has said countless times that Apple is a PRODUCT company. Their reason for being is to create the most kick-ass, eye-popping products in the world. Yes, they want to make a profit (only because it allows them keep creating more kick-ass products and keep inventing.) They don't care DIDDLY about being the biggest, or the most dominant, or the standard or the darling of the corporate drone. They are all about creating dazzling product.

Microsoft is about HUGE. They are about business models and pounding competition into the dirt. They are about 'forcing' people into their products by licensing deals and squelching competition. It's about BUSINESS, not product. Sure, you can get to be the richest guy and company in the world doing this, but your products will still be mediocre dreck. And you will be mostly hated, or ignored, or irrelevant. You can be rich, however.

Quote this post ↓

Topolino said:

member since 15 Mar 2006 with 1 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I am dying to see the upcoming packaging from Microsoft. They've really put themselves up for some serious scrutiny after admiting they did this themselves....

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
They probably did that video as a true mockup and then switched their story to "It was supposed to be funny." after they saw the reaction around the 'net. Heh!

Hence the theme from Peewee Herman?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

It should come as no surprise that all large companies are broken up internally into warring feifdoms. Engineers vs admin vs design vs marketing. Even various engineeering projects fight for perceived recognition etc. This sort of video is not unusual by any means. Just another grenade over the parapet.

What surprises me is that they left the size of the box alone. Doubling it would have made more space for text etc including the "contents may settle during transport".

May contain traces of nuts.

Quote this post ↓

JulesLt said:

member since 06 Jul 2005 with 136 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Do a search on Google for 'Microsoft Max' and you will see another place where Microsoft marketing are learning from Apple.

The problem for MS is that they have so many competitors to go against - XBox has to compete with Playstation (and does so by emphasising XBox over Microsoft).

On-line, they want to be both AOL (MSN) and Google - both of which have very different brands.

With the desktop - well Apple have always done well at marketing to consumers and freelance professionals, but that image has cost them badly in the corporate sector where IBM and then MS ruled. You can't market to both audiences in the same way - the sensible idea would be having two brands and pushing the brand rather than the company. You can't be all things to all people AND keep a coherent brand (of course you could become like one of those unknown giants who have lots of brands and no products under their own name).

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The re-design is just like their software...spaghetti code

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

A guest said: (hide)

Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:18 pm

Just shows that Microsoft and Apple are ENTIRELY different types of companies.

Jobs has said countless times that Apple is a PRODUCT company. Their reason for being is to create the most kick-ass, eye-popping products in the world. Yes, they want to make a profit (only because it allows them keep creating more kick-ass products and keep inventing.) They don't care DIDDLY about being the biggest, or the most dominant, or the standard or the darling of the corporate drone. They are all about creating dazzling product.

im pretty sure apple and microsoft are both about the same thing: profit

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
MS DOS

The bluescreen

Frustration

Nope !!!

MS - DOS was bought in.

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
To say that "MS will always come up short to Apple" and "MS will never be Apple no matter how hard they try" must be one of the most asinine statements I have ever read on the internet. Bill Gates did not become THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD without being an innovator, to say that MS has not (been an innovator) is just plain ignoring the facts. Apple had a small hardcore niche market until the iPod sparked people's interest in them again. No one can doubt Apple makes solid products that have a growing following, no one can doubt the quality of the iPod or any of their products but to attribute all of the sucess to Steve Jobs himself is idiocy, hundreds if not thousands of people contributed to the success of Apple's products. Also concerning "thinking outside of the box", Apple is the box now, they made a great product and now it is everyone's goal to make a better one. Someday someone will create a new product that will "Make Apple look like MS", no one is number one forever.

Wow. Revisionist History 101.

Not to start a war or anything, but can you name three things that Microsoft innovated? (Do not include anything bought, copied, or stolen.)

Sure no problem ....

Infra-red Mouse

Visual Studio Codesense Engine

Unified IDE

Natural Keyboard

RTF (Rich Text) File format

Tabbed Window View

IntelliMouse

Customizable Tool Palettes

But you fan-boys seldom get the point MS is about ebracing standards and expanding on the functionality .... its worked for them ... meanwhile apple gives us crappletalk and the much loved single button mouse. Microsoft DOESN'T innovate ... they make computers usefull

Hell the dreamcast was innovative .... but that diddn't go so well. oh and BTW OSX is no inovtion it was bought (openstep) and sadly not even that is all to special (BSD)

Now its your turn ... tell me what apple has created. Besides an irritating CEO

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
The re-design is just like their software...spaghetti code

Have you ever seen their code ... I doubt it

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:

Wow. Revisionist History 101.

Not to start a war or anything, but can you name three things that Microsoft innovated? (Do not include anything bought, copied, or stolen.)

Sure no problem ....

Infra-red Mouse (Not!)

Visual Studio Codesense Engine

Unified IDE (Not!)

Natural Keyboard

RTF (Rich Text) File format (Not!)

Tabbed Window View (Not!)

IntelliMouse

Customizable Tool Palettes (Not!)

But you fan-boys seldom get the point MS is about ebracing standards and expanding on the functionality .... its worked for them ... meanwhile apple gives us crappletalk and the much loved single button mouse. Microsoft DOESN'T innovate ... they make computers usefull

Hell the dreamcast was innovative .... but that diddn't go so well. oh and BTW OSX is no inovtion it was bought (openstep) and sadly not even that is all to special (BSD)

Now its your turn ... tell me what apple has created. Besides an irritating CEO

Accessories

Airport (codeveloped with Lucent)

Control Panel

Cut and Paste

Desktop Bus

Drag and Drop

Hypercard

Inside Macintosh

Laser Printer

MacDraw, MacPaint, MacWrite

Plug and Play

Undo

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

MS gets money for every iPod sold, patents.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

For you MS haters, think about what apple actually developed, just like MS they buy or steal most of thier ideas. iPod was not the first MP3 player, Apple's OS was not the first GUI. I'm not trying to say MS is better, but isn't this a case of the pot calling the kettle....

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Don't forget Fonts:

Monospaced and Proportional Screen and Printer Fonts

Bold, Underline, Italic, Outline, etc.

in various sizes

Too bad they included the infamous San Francisco font.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Newton PDA

Quicktime Audio/Video

BTW: Who sold the first GUI, if not Apple?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

One more for MicroSoft:

Vaporware.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Mr. Pilla noted: "While MS did not release the video, it's natural to share funny things with friends.

What, wasn't that communistic? Anti-social? Destroying families and America?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The first GUI was Xerox PARC, which never sold because Xerox's executives had no idea what they had on their hands.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Apple is a wonderful company where everyone is happy and nobody ever feels mistreated. Everyone has a nice big window in their office. The hallways are strewn with fresh roses. They don't care about making money, they care more about being nice guys and gals. They have never taken a position that caused another company to make less money or realize less income. If it were up to them, everyone would make money and succeed, even if they had competing products. Everything Apple has ever done has been 100% through their own innovation. They have never had an unoriginal thought, much less an unoriginal product. They never make you install software that you do not want. Their software is always perfect and doesn't try to change my default file associations and reorganize my music collection. They are all about open source. Apple has never tried to leverage their position to increase sales.

Does that about cover it? If I were to take all the anti-MS pablum that I hear on these boards and assume the opposite is true for Apple, I would be left with the above nonsense.

Why do I personally choose to not use their products?

I won't install Quicktime because the associated .mov file extension is only usable with Quicktime. I refuse that product on principle. If MS were to do the same thing, all you who "drank the Kool-Aid" would be up in arms saying they are not playing nice.

iTunes does nothing notable that I can't do with less invasive applications.

The iPod does nothing notable I can't do for a cheaper life-cycle cost.

Nobody makes Apple compatible client software for the technical applications I use. BTW, if they had as many third-party folks writing applications for their OS, they would lose any stability advantages that my Apple-obsessive friends tell me they have with the Apple OS.

As I see it, Apple makes totally acceptable products for leisure, multimedia, and nonspecific office work. That's fine, if that's what you want. It doesn't meet my needs, but to each their own. I need a computer that is capable of running the third party applications as needed by my customers.

However, if you think Apple is a warm, fuzzy company that is somehow different from the evil MSEmpire, you may be surprised to know what happens when they close the shades. Business is business. Apple is better at marketing that happy-happy-joy-joy feeling that Saturn could have patented in the 80's and MS is better at bringing products to market that are more usefully applied.

The only difference is that MS is currently winning the race and Apple is spinning that fact into the "Aw, shucks... We just want you to like us, because we are just the innocuous little guys." Personally, I have an instant mistrust of any company that claims to be in business to "make great products". That is total marketing and is a total lie. I've always known MS was in business to make money, isn't everyone?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Actually PARC is Palo Alto Research Center, where Xerox engineers came up with the famous GUI that Jobs and Co. got a good look at.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

It's possible Microsoft released the video to try and get some of the "grass roots" and "friendly" aura that is Apple marketing. Microsoft's attempt at putting on a human face unfortunately has backfired as countless people who have seen the video nod their heads in agreement how Microsoft has managed to turn yet another great idea into a horrible mess.

Someone said Microsoft does great marketing. In fact the opposite is true. They are big because of illegal anti-trust tactics (i.e., criminal activity) and nobody caught on when they are perpetrating their crimes. On the other hand, Apple has not only survived but is thriving, even against such an enormous beast. So obviously the winner is Apple with its superior products and superior marketing over the years.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

« It's possible Microsoft released the video to try and get some of the "grass roots" and "friendly" aura that is Apple marketing. Microsoft's attempt at putting on a human face unfortunately has backfired as countless people who have seen the video nod their heads in agreement how Microsoft has managed to turn yet another great idea into a horrible mess. »

If they wanted to show that trendiness dissolves in humor, t worked quite well.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

why dont they spend some money on creating some decent products? over some phoney advertising for laughs?

why? because Microsoft sits on thier asses mucking round and we get the cruddy products as a result.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I've got to say that this video is the best work I've ever seen from Microsoft. The shareholders should put its producers in charge of the company, because Ballmer's letting the place go to hell in a handbasket.

Oh, and to the guy above who said "MS is better at bringing products to market that are more usefully applied", are you on crack? Have you been under a rock for the last decade, while every MS product bloated up, except of course Longhorn, which is over six years late and counting?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

actually, reading the comments here (especially the ones from the Apple-Fanboys) is a lot funnier than the vid itself.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=aeXAcwriid0 its still there at gmt14:19 16 Mar 2006

I'd like to add that they would be better employed getting a decent operating system etc

Quote this post ↓

BradC said:

member since 29 Apr 2005 with 80 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Quote

As I see it, Apple makes totally acceptable products for leisure, multimedia, and nonspecific office work. That's fine, if that's what you want. It doesn't meet my needs, but to each their own. I need a computer that is capable of running the third party applications as needed by my customers."

And yet tons of people use QuickTime and iTunes, and Apple dominates the market for MP3 players. So clearly most people don't view those products the way you do.

Mac OS X is also heavily used in the scientific arena, where the underlying stability of the OS is a huge factor for people running sensitive apps. Who in that field uses Windows? It's all Linux or Mac OS X, for the most part.

Quote
Personally, I have an instant mistrust of any company that claims to be in business to "make great products". That is total marketing and is a total lie. I've always known MS was in business to make money, isn't everyone?

I don't understand the logic here. It's bad for a company to say that it wants to make great products? Of course every business exists to make money (except non-profits, obviously), given the fact that we live in a capitalist society. That's a given. But I don't see what's so terrible about a company saying that they want to make great stuff. Clearly consumers are agreeing with Apple there, at least as far as the iPod goes, and there's some evidence that their satisfaction with it is translating into people looking more closely at using Macs.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Quote
Guest wrote:

Now, on to the video at hand. It's hardly surprising that designers are going to take on marketing. That happens everywhere. What the M$ rep said was a nice PR cover, but are there heads rolling? No doubt. If you've read up on M$ corporate culture, it'd be hard to believe that there wouldn't be retaliation. Honestly, M$ is no Apple -- the corporate DNA is wholly different.

hey...i work at microsoft and would be really surprised if any heads were rolling other than in laughter....parody is a part of MS culture

Quote this post ↓

macinnerd said:

member since 15 Jun 2005 with 1621 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

This thread has more than 121k views. Wow.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Having had worked for Microsoft indirectly when I was at HP in 2002, I can tell you they don't take themselves seriously sometimes, and they KNOW how to make fun of themselves. If this video made it out, it was intended to. I've seen many other instances online since I've had access to the net. Laugh it up - enjoy it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Lol, pretty funny stuff all around. One thing that often gets lost in the news about 'the corporate giant' is that Microsoft started out as a small company and grew big by acquiring small and large companies. It does have a lot of consistency under the Microsoft branding, but each product group has their own culture and personality.

As to heads rolling over funny clips, google Microsoft PDC videos for some more funny stuff, like the wonderful 'Bill Gates goes to college': http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2679657?htv=12&htv=12

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Anyone here over 12 years old? This whole Apple vs. Microsoft thing is 'tarded. Apple was building and selling computers long before the Mac, before Windows, before Bill had his big deal with IBM after he stole DOS from Tim Paterson. Apple WAS a leader, Microsoft a follower...anyone remember what OS Excel and Word were created for? Of course, the board at Apple threw away their heart in 1985, then they sacrificed market share for gross margins and dividends. Microsoft is now bigger...big deal.

Why do I like Apple's Macs? I make money by making them productive and my first computer was an Apple II. Timex-Sinclairs just didn't do it