You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: iPod Pricing Information Misintrepeted [UPDATE]

News

iPod Pricing Information Misintrepeted [UPDATE]

Reports have begun to surface that an Apple exec said the company is planning on reducing iPod prices in June. This is Money quoted Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer, and though the media outlet didn't attribute the story, it came from a Reuters piece that ran Wednesday. The problem, however, is that the comment is being taken out of context.

The quote was in reference to the iPod's average selling price (ASP), a term used in the world of corporate finance to refer to the total average price of product line throughout the quarter. If pricing on a product is raised or lowered during a quarter, its ASP will be affected when the company reports its results.

In this case, Mr. Oppenheimer told Reuters, ""We expect [iPod's ASP] to be down a little bit in the June quarter." This is because the June quarter will be the first quarter with the iPods introduced during the March quarter with lower prices (iPod shuffle now starts at $69, and the iPod nano now starts at $149).

Apple has a long history of not offering product-level guidance for its products. In the analyst conference call held Wednesday, for instance, Apple execs Peter Oppenheimer and Tim Cook refused all efforts from analysts to get a clarification from Apple on whether or not the company would lower the price of either its Mac mini or iPod line in an effort to get more market share.

When the two were asked pointed questions about Apple product pricing, Mr. Oppenheimer replied "As you know, we don't give product level guidance."

Since This is Money's report first appeared Thursday, TechWeb and other media outlets have since repeated the misinterpretation.

Apple declined to comment for this story.

[Update: This story has been updated with a better clarification on where the quote came from, and how it was being misinterpreted. - Editor]

3 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

The comment made in the conference call referenced that Apple expected the iPod "average selling price" to be lower for the next quarter. In other words, out of the complete mix of iPods for sale, Apple expected more of the lower end iPods (read Nano's) to be sold over the next quarter, as opposed to the higher priced iPod video's. This would result in a lower "average selling price" of all iPods sold in the quarter. Nowhere in the call did anyone say that iPod retail prices would drop.

Quote this post ↓

Rainy Day said:

member since 07 Jun 2005 with 607 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I think you mean to say “ASP will be affected,” not “ASP will be effected.” It would be pretty funny if the “ASP will be effected” by that!

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1922 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Rainy Day wrote:
I think you mean to say “ASP will be affected,” not “ASP will be effected.” It would be pretty funny if the “ASP will be effected” by that!

I have a H*11 of a time with that one too. The difference in meaning is really rather subtle. See;

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_spelprob.html

(Scroll down past Accept / Except which I find easier to keep straight.)

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.