News

Yahoo! Music Offers DRM-free Song

Yahoo! Music is offering Jessica Simpson's A Public Affair as a Digital Rights Management-free MP3 download. The offer is a one-time promotional deal with the Epic record label, according to Wired.

Instead of the typical US$0.99 per song, Yahoo! Music is charging $1.99 for the copy protection-free version. Without any copy protections, there is no mechanism in place to stop listeners from making copies of the song, burning CDs, or listening to it on a portable music player.

Buyers also get to customize the song by adding their own name to the lyrics.

Yahoo! Music's Ian Rogers commented in the company's music blog "As you know, we've been publicly trying to convince record labels that they should be selling MP3s for a while now. Our position is simple: DRM doesn't add any value for the artist, label (who are selling DRM-free music every day -- the compact disc) or consumer, the only people it adds value to are the technology companies who are interested in locking consumers to a particular technology platform."

Although the move to offer a copy protection-free song looks like a move towards a more open music download market, it's more likely just another promotional gimmick. Most record labels are holding on to their music assets tightly for fear of losing revenue to unauthorized downloads and copies.

In comparison, Apple's iTunes Music store offers a free promotional song every week that is encoded with its FairPlay copy protection - a more palatable option for the music labels.

5 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

jimothy said:

member since 04 Jun 2004 with 611 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

$1.99?!? Not that I'm interested in Jessica Simpson (well, not her vocal talents, anyway), but I think selling it at twice the price is a mistake. That's ASKING people to "share" this, um, gem of a song. "I paid more for it, I have the right to pirate it!"

Quote this post ↓

L0u13 said:

member since 26 Dec 2001 with 4110 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

It's all in the CHOICE of the song.... who the hell would want to pirate the song?

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2088 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

C'mon, guys, it could be worse: they could have offered "songs" by her sister.

Quote this post ↓

Mikuro said:

member since 15 Jun 2002 with 457 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Kudos to Yahoo for this. It's disappointing that there aren't more DRM-free songs, and it's also disappointing that they cost twice as much, but hey, it's something. This can only be good for consumers. I 100% agree with their statement that DRM is not worth the cost to anyone. The idea of DRM was hatched by a bunch of scared suits that didn't understand technology OR the people who use it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Hmm ... so I can pay $1.99 and download a DRM-free song, or I can download one of the free Apple tunes of the week, burn it to a CD and then reimport it DRM-free. Even if I was willing to pay $0.99 for Jessica Simpson, I could buy a CD for $0.15 and still be way ahead (especially if I was willing until I accumulated songs to burn a whole disk of music).

So why is this such a big deal? Is it really worth almost a dollar for someone to convert a DRM song to a CD and then reimport it?

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.