You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Research Firm: Only 14% Would Pay $15 For an iTunes Movie

News

Research Firm: Only 14% Would Pay $15 For an iTunes Movie

A new two-part report from The Diffusion Group (TDG) shows that 23% of broadband-connected consumers would pay US$10 per download for movies from the iTunes Music Store, while just 14% would be interested in paying $15 each.

TDG founder Michael Greeson speculated in a press release that Apple insisted on charging $10 for all movies, half the cost of other online services, but the studios demanded $20 per download. He thinks that the two agreed to split the difference and will sell movies for $15 each. "All things equal, this appears to make sense," he said.

He also addressed the timing of Apple's entry in this market, which many pundits assume will happen next Tuesday, during the company's scheduled press event in San Francisco. "Although current services such as CinemaNow and Movielink continue to languish," Mr. Greeson said, "Apple is aware that the conditions are now suitable for extending iTunes to include full-length movie downloads. Consumer awareness has improved; video-over-broadband is now viable; studios are now making movies available for online download to DVDs; portable video platforms are improving qualitatively with each new generation; and Apple's brand awareness and credibility are at all time highs."

He concluded: "As well, CinemaNow and Movielink's experience, while insightful, is of limited value to Apple, who continues to enjoy the fruits of being a market-maker in portable digital electronics and online media services."

In addition, he told MarketWatch's Frank Barnako: "Connecting ... to the living room TV is imperative to expanding the online movie market beyond the earlier adopters and to helping move Apple into the living room."

On the Viability of an iTunes Movie Download Service is available from TDG in two parts: part one looks at getting movies onto computers while the second part examines how Apple might enable consumers to play those films back on their TVs. Each one sells for $1,495 for an individual license or $2,490 for an enterprise license.

7 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Edison Carter said:

member since 10 Aug 2006 with 228 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

$10.00 or $15.00, it would be $9.99 or $14.99, but I get the point.

Does anyone know how retail pricing breaks down for video, how much for store overhead, residuals, and such? Duplication and packaging of a particular DVD on a large scale is probably only a few cents.

Quote this post ↓

DrShakagee said:

member since 14 Jun 2001 with 941 posts, TMO Forum Mod, send him a message or view his profile

I agree

Quote this post ↓

Rainy Day said:

member since 07 Jun 2005 with 607 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

“ Each one sells for $1,495 for an individual license or $2,490 for an enterprise license.”

Or you could just wait until Tuesday and see what will happen for real (for free).

Quote this post ↓

boric*acid said:

member since 13 Jun 2006 with 28 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Whatever happens, $20.00 for a download is just plain retarded when you can get higher quality bit torrents for free . . . hope they don't screw this up.

Quote this post ↓

algr said:

member since 07 Aug 2003 with 296 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Given the high resolution of Mac displays, the low resolution of current downloads is certain to turn people off. An Apple store near me had Lost playing on a 30 inch screen from an iPod, and it looked awful - worse then VHS. I had to double check it to be sure there wasn't some tech problem with it. Higher resolution downloads accompanying a video iPod would be better. Maybe it isn't a screen on the iPod, but eyeglass LCDs. That would be new, and a better way to watch.

There has to be something more then "we've got movies.", as I can't see that filling a whole live event.

Quote this post ↓

brett_x said:

member since 24 Jan 2006 with 322 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote:
23% of broadband-connected consumers would pay US$10 per download for movies from the iTunes Music Store, while just 14% would be interested in paying $15 each.

Is it not surprising that 60% of consumers aren't willing to pay 50% more for something?

And boric*acid ... the fact that you even consider illegally downloading movies over bit torrent pretty much excludes you from the target audience. People that are willing to steal are still going to steal. For the people who don't consider theft, the issue is convenience.. otherwise we'd just go to the store and buy the movie.

Quote this post ↓

elbuf said:

member since 07 Sep 2006 with 1 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I don't want to buy movies at all. I much prefer rental or a subscription model like Netflix. Am I alone in this? I typically watch 3 movies a week. If I really like a movie, I might watch it once every year. I have no interest in having stacks of DVDs (or hard drives) of movies at $10 a pop, sitting waiting to be watched. I'd much rather pay $1 or $2 to rent from a library of as many movies as possible...basically, Netflix without the envelopes and lag time.

Don't get me wrong: music I want to own, but movies are a lot different. Wasn't that the rumor a few weeks ago, that Apple was being restricted by the studios to a rental model? I guess we'll see on Tuesday.

elbuf.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.