News

Wozniak Talks Switch to Mac OS X, the iPod, More

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak admits he questioned the purchase of NeXT and the switch to Mac OS X, but he thinks the iPod is comparable to the Apple II computer because it "also found the whole formula." He made those comments to Macworld UK, which interviewed him in London during his publicity tour for his new book, iWoz: From Computer Geek to Cult Icon: How I Invented the Personal Computer, Co-Founded Apple, and Had Fun Doing It.

At the time Apple bought NeXT, Mr. Wozniak said that he spoke with fellow co-founder Steve Jobs about it: "I remember asking Steve, telling Steve, that we didn't really need a new operating system for that amount of money involved in the purchase of NeXT. But he said he had an obligation to his shareholders at NeXT." He also said that the OS 7 crashes of the time were linked to the use of Microsoft Internet Explorer. "There was nothing wrong with OS 7," he said.

While he now admits that Mac OS X means "we have a better, more stable, more complete operating system, from the ground up," he also said that he was happy with OS 9. "It was just so secure," he said. "Mac OS 9 was differently constructed to anything else. It wasn't because it was minor and unknown." Regarding OS X's security, he pointed out: "Some of the holes in Unix are well known. So keeping Firewalls on is more important. And we keep announcing, even our own security fixes, not as many as Microsoft but still we never really had those in the OS 9 days."

On the subject of the iPod, Mr. Wozniak said: "What the person wants is not a music player, the person wants music to their ears. From the artist to the ear. So here's Apple, it's got the iTunes Store, it's got the great iTunes program and it's got the great supportable device, the iPod, and it all works together and it flows together with almost no thinking. The iPod is the first music device that's not a music device. It is a little satellite to your own computer."

As for the founding of Apple, he commented: "I never wanted to start a company, I think Steve was much more important in getting the company going. Steve had the vision of reaching the masses and changing the world much more than I did, so he deserves credit for that more than anything. I had the vision for a computer that was useable, that was low cost, that was an incredible thing of its time, and that would amaze people. The Apple II was so far ahead as a product of all time, it was the best product ever, better than anyone could ever imagine."

Mr. Wozniak added: "I think it took both of us, it was a really lucky combination. Because he had the goals and he had the drive and the ambition. Both of us being young also helped. And the fact that the big companies didn't foresee what it would become."

4 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

I like Woz. Wish he and Jobs would talk these days, but I guess those two will never make up. Though more of the animosity is on the Jobs side, of course.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

There's not that much anomiosity - Woz is an invited guests to all of Apple's special events so while Jobs loves his privacy and doesn't really want us to know anything about him, he's just being him - Woz is Woz also playing Segway polo, even answering the question posed on Metafilter's answer section when someone asked, "What's Woz really like?" HE ACTUALLY ANSWERED. Steve Jobs is totally different but he's also seemingly always honest - he jkust choose to avoid anything about his private life ... they built a great company and also proved that an average guy could launch a multi billion company literally in their harage ... while every knew the history of HP, Intel & Fairchild, it really took Apple to show that you can in Silicon Valley literally create a $500 million dollar business in 3 years and I believe they were the fastest to a billion at the time ...

Quote this post ↓

Semeyaza said:

member since 29 Aug 2002 with 130 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Woz had the idea and realized it, but Jobs had the dream that ultimately reached us all. I think that without Woz Jobs wouldn't had nothing to sell, but without Jobs, Woz wouldn't had sold anything.

Lucky for us they were friends.

Cheers

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Guest wrote:
There's not that much anomiosity -

Umm... no. That's revisionist history.

The animosity is so bad (on Jobs' side) that he refused to pose for photos with Woz at Macworld one year. Don't know the roots of it, but Stevie J definitely does not like Stevie W for some reason. Some of it may have to do with a story coming out (after many years) of how Jobs' lied to Woz and bilked him out of some money when they were both 'starving entrepeneurs' doing one-off jobs for the likes of Atari.

Stevie J just may be embarrassed and too egotistical to apologize for what he did. That's the theory, anyway.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.