Review

iTunes TV Review - Lost Episode 3.5, "The Cost of Living"

Episode 3.5, "The Cost of Living"
Original Airdate: November 1st, 2006

One of the early leading theories about the story behind Lost--the big answer to the big question that has haunted viewers and writers alike since the show's debut--was that the castaways were actually dead, and this island was some form of limbo or purgatory, where they had to atone for past sins before moving on to...heaven, I guess? Care-A-Lot? Eternia?

Who knows. Not the greatest of theories, and it was quickly shot down by the writers. But it resonates in the sense that these ARE damaged souls, these random folks brought together on this inexplicable island by the crash of Oceanic Flight 815.

Each character has some dark secret in their past, some sin or sins that hang heavy upon their souls. Jack was a terrible son and an even worse husband. Kate was a criminal on the run from the law, and a murderess. Sawyer bilked gullible saps out of their money and their dignity with his con jobs.

And worst among them must be Mr. Eko, the last remaining "Tailie" in our main cast, a stoic and pained mountain of a man who committed any number of unspeakable criminal atrocities as a hardcore crime lord in his native Africa--only to return to his village and impersonate a priest after being directly responsible for the death of his brother.

Not only did the dear departed Eko have the most terrible past of any castaway on the island, he also suffered the most for his sins. This was a haunted man, truly troubled on a daily basis by the atrocities he had committed. Yet there was a thin undercurrent of hope beneath his atonement, as though he really believed if he finished that wacky church he was building and prayed enough prayers and saved enough souls, he could make up for the terrible things he'd done.

We now know that he couldn't make up for those crimes; the island would not let him. The big black cloud of smoke came along and killed him. Which was brutal, and sad, and unnerving, all at once.

Which is EXACTLY what I want from Lost.

This is by far the best episode of season three so far, and one that hearkens back to the classic episodes of season one, installments like "Walkabout," where the twists and turns and impact of these characters' pasts came fully to bear on their behavior on the island. The inevitability of the cold, hard hand of fate--the force of nature that insures that Eko cannot escape his past, no matter how hard he tries--weighs heavy on every minute of this episode, the flashbacks AND the island material.

My mind just keeps reaching back to a brief moment in the episode, something that you may even have missed, and an image I had to confirm by rewinding my DVR and rewatching the scene a second time. It's a relatively throwaway shot, where Eko is staggering through the jungle, but for a brief second, we see the black smoke form behind Eko, and then evaporate. The viewer barely notices and Eko doesn't see it, but those who catch it realize the truth--that Eko is running from the evil he has done and the evil he is capable of doing, and he CANNOT ESCAPE IT.

Lost is consistently one of the best-directed shows on television, a series where the individual style of the director is allowed to flourish, unlike other shows where personal style is subsumed inside the visual and editing style of the series as a whole. With last night's installment, director Jack Bender delivered a tour de force of television directing, supported fully by the instincts of Lost's editing staff. Those sequences of Eko stumbling through the jungle, in anguish and in pain, are some of the most affecting moments in the show's history.

What's amazing to me, too, is that the WHY of the black smoke monster becomes completely uninteresting once you realize it's acting as this unstoppable force of vengeance on the island. Who built it? How did they build it? Does it answer to someone someplace?

Who cares?! It's cool and it's relentless. End of story.

In other words, give us better story, deeper characters, and compelling conflict, and we won't CARE about these endless unanswered questions.

And if I could tattoo that on Damon Lindelof's forehead, maybe this show would be just this awesome every week.

iTunes Links:

Lost Series
Lost Season 3
"The Cost of Living" (Not yet posted on iTunes)


Need more? Talk about Lost in our new iPodObserver.com forums.

Matt Springer's writing career has spanned magazine journalism, PR and marketing, and random online babblings, including stints at Cinescape and the Official Buffy Magazine. His first novel, Unconventional, is a tale of sex, booze, and geeks; learn more about it at Alert Nerd Press.

Lost Archives.

8 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

I do not mean to offend, but why are reviews of TV shows posted on this website? The website should review the quality of the video, the experience of watching the show on an iPod, computer or TV. Please reviews of the show itself in a more appropriate place.

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1917 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I've been hesitating to criticize but I agree with guest. Knowing that iTS has Lost or Battlestar Galactica is Mac/iPod news. A play by play review of each episode is, to my mind, not. If you want to do this sort of thing maybe you could consider an iTunesObserver tab at the top and then just reviewing and announcing what's on the iTS there separated from the Apple hardware and software news on MacObserver and iPodObserver.

Quote this post ↓

Bryan said:

member since 11 Jun 2001 with 7340 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Seriously? If you think iPods are only about what case you have or what earbuds you use, that's your problem.

iPod and iTunes are both at least as much about what you put in your iPod as what you put your iPod in, and that includes music and video content.

Notice, BTW, that we're reviewing music and video, in addition to our excellent gear reviews.

Oh, and do remember, please, that you don't have to click through to any given page if you don't want to. The idea of complaining because something like this is being offered (for free) strikes me as silly.

Quote this post ↓

MaxHedrm said:

member since 13 Jan 2003 with 8 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Bryan, remind me to never click an ad on this site. Both of these bits of feedback were polite & well written, and you respond with "If you don't like it you have a problem". Way to treat your customer.

I tend to agree with them. I actually peruse a lot of your articles on my palm first via the AvantGo MacObserver Mobile Edition, then follow up online when there is something of interest. While I have an iPod (and have since I bought my 10GB 1G shortly after it came out), I am more interested in the Mac side of it. Getting the occasional iPod accessory review or announcement of new media availability was ok, but having a TV show review pop up seems out of place. If I wanted to know what someone else thinks about a show, I would go to a critic site, not a technology site.

This one was particularly silly since it wasn't even available on iTunes when it was posted.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Bryan, perhaps you should also be posting reviews of President Bush because he owns an iPod. Maybe we can also have weather reports because I listen to my iPod outdoors. As you can see, I can take this to an extreme and be as silly as you! MacObserver and iPodObserver are technology sites that are supposed to deal with questions like should I buy an MP3 player and, if so, should I buy one versus another. The fact that the iTunes store has a particular song or TV show or Movie is relevant. The quality of the listening and/or viewing experience on a computer versus a TV versus an iPod is also relevant. An article saying that the available TV shows are limited or broad (whichever you like) is relevant. A review of an individual item available at the iTunes store doesn;t fit with the site. I get the feeling that you want to be a TV, Movie or music critic and need a place to post these. If this is your only outlet and you want to post it here, go right ahead. After all, it is your site. However, you should be able to handle politely worded criticism in a responsible, adult manner.

You are correct - I am free to choose which stories to click through to and which ones to avoid. However, as the number of posts grows larger and is filled with what I consider spam, then I am also free to stop visiting your site. I ignored the first few posts reviews of TV shows hoping they would go away. Once I started to see more, I felt it was my duty, as your customer, to tell you what I don't like. Your choice, as the supplier, is to ignore me, try to understand why I feel this way, see if others feel this way and, in the end, decide if you want to keep posting these reviews here, move them elsewhere or find another outlet for your creativity. If I treated my customers the way you treated me I would be out business pretty quickly.

Quote this post ↓

MattSpringer said:

member since 09 Oct 2006 with 2 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

One fact that everyone seems to be ignoring is that this review is TERRIBLE.

seriously, where does he find these people? Halfway houses? Mental wards? The White House?

iPodObserver is CLEARLY trying to become an iPod lifestyle site as much as it is an iPod tech & accessories site--and frankly, at the risk of sending people fleeing, there are other sites who spend their every waking hour documenting the SCINTILLATING release of every goddamned 2G Nano sleeve and FM transmitter that hits the shelves, along with the requisite 2000-word review of each.

by focusing on iPod as a lifestyle, I think iPodObserver becomes a more unique and interesting place.

but regardless, PLEASE FIRE THIS WRITER. His work is offensive to me. I only enjoy GOOD writers, like Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code, which I LOVED, btw! LOLLERS!

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1917 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

MattSpringer wrote:
iPodObserver is CLEARLY trying to become an iPod lifestyle site as much as it is an iPod tech & accessories site

If you want to run a "lifestyle" magazine, I have no problem with that, as long as I understand the model. It just wasn't clear that was the focus. MacObserver deals with Apple and Macintosh technology. DealsOnTheWeb is about technology sales. It was logical to assume that the iPodObserver would also be a technology site. Early on iPodObserver was mostly technology oriented. The content reviews started small and have been have been slowly growing. Only recently have they become a dominant percentage of the articles. Now that I understand where you're going with this, I'll chill.

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1917 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I went back and checked. The link in MacObserver to the article was marked iTunes TV Review so I guess you were trying to make it clear that it was something different from the hardware reviews. I really should have caught that. My Bad.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.