You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Bush: No iPods for North Korea

News

Bush: No iPods for North Korea

President Bush is attempting to impose targeted trade sanctions against North Korea to deprive Kim Jong Il of the luxury items he enjoys. One of the items on the list: Apple's iPod. According to Yahoo! News, the items on the sanction list are products that North Korea's leader personally covets, or gives as presents to the loyalist families that run his communist government.

Other products on the list include cognac, Rolex watches, cigarettes, artwork, plasma televisions, expensive cars, Harley Davidson motorcycles, and Jet Skis.

Former senior Commerce Department official under President Bill Clinton, William Reinsch, expects most governments will support the new sanctions. But preventing underground product shipments into North Korea will be very difficult. He said "The problem is there has always been and will always be this group of people who work at getting these goods illegally."

iPods and other small electronic devices are "untraceable and available all over the place," he added.

Regardless of the impact the sanctions have on North Korea, it looks like the iPod is now one of President Bush's new politcal weapons.

Thanks to TMO reader George Slusher for the heads up.

19 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1922 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I have an iPod and Kim Jong Il can't have one

neener-neeener-neener

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

That's about as stupid as it can get. Doesn't Bush realize that North Korea can get those items from other markets? Black market iPods, wtaches and tvs may cost a bit more, but what's a few extra dollars when you want the best? And I seriously doubt that denying North Korea iPods will sway them in any meaningful way.

It's not even an inconvenience. Why bother?

Quote this post ↓

jimothy said:

member since 04 Jun 2004 with 612 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Stick 'em with a bunch of Zunes. That'll show those commie bastards.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I second Jimothy's Zune idea!

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1922 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Or to take it a step further we should give the North Krean Govt a whole bunch of new Dells running WinXP. Then we would have no trouble keylogging them and we'd know what they're up to.

Quote this post ↓

Brutno said:

member since 28 Aug 2002 with 198 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

geoduck wrote:
Or to take it a step further we should give the North Krean Govt a whole bunch of new Dells running WinXP. Then we would have no trouble keylogging them and we'd know what they're up to.

LOL!

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Without an iPod, Kim Jong Il will be so ronery.

And to the guest posting about how stupid this is, consider that it isn't just the iPod. The sanction is luxury goods. Specifically those things that Kim Jong Il and the country's leadership enjoy, including cognac (Kim is rumored to spend about $1M on Hennessy Paradis per year). The sanction is aimed directly at them, without hurting the populace.

Will it be impossible for them to get these items now? No. Will it be much more difficult? Certainly.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

So how would anyone enforce the sanctions? If any other Joe Kim can buy an iPod what's stopping him from buying them from his government? Again I say it makes no difference, Jong will buy what he wants elsewhere. The only way to block ANY items from getting into Jong's hand is to blockade to country, and I doubt anyone is talking about doing that.

This is little more than ineffectual political posturing. And it's stupid, which is inline with the current administration's policies.

I agree with sending them Dells tho. It could work.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Yet another smart move by Bush and the wise leaders of this country! Sanctions have worked so well against Cuba.

</sarcasm>

Quote this post ↓

Edison Carter said:

member since 10 Aug 2006 with 228 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

We should pre-load the iPods with pro USA and anti Kim Jong Il music and video propaganda then hand them out to the North Koreans.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I think the point of "targeted" sanctions is that specific items are targeted, not specific people. So nobody in DPRK could buy the blacklisted items. But, since practically nobody outside of Kim Jong Il's tight circle could afford them anyway, it affects those at the top the most.

I for one congratulate the President for a moderately creative idea and hope he has not exhausted his supply.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Anonymous wrote:
Yet another smart move by Bush and the wise leaders of this country! Sanctions have worked so well against Cuba.

</sarcasm>

The Bush administration didn't impose the sanctions against Cuba. The Kennedy administration did. Can't blame that one on Bush.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Kim Jong Il will now change course and renounce nuclear weapons, as he really, really wants to get his hands on a 2G Nano, so he can listen to it while sipping cognac on his jet ski. Deprived of his luxury goods, he will have to go through the inconvenience of getting things through the black market, which will make his knees tremble. What if there's no warranty, he'll be thinking in abject terror. We have him now!!! Yeahhhh, right.

I guess Bush really is as stupid as everyone says. Dear God.

Quote this post ↓

Bosco said:

member since 03 Jun 2002 with 1002 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Everybody knows that George Bush is a poopie head who stole several elections dating way back to bathroom hall monitor in 3rd grade because Timmy Jones was more loved by his classmates than Georgie. Not to mention stealing the Texas governor's race from Ann Richards. There were no Republicans in Texas and we all know that Ann Richards was the best governor ever and nobody was more loved by all of Texas than Ann Richards. Then he stole the Presidency in 2000 by having James Baker and wife Tammy Fae count dangling chads in a precinct that's actually part of Cuba, not Florida. Then, he stole it again in 2004 by painting his opponent as a flip-flopping, military hating, lying Massachusettes liberal with fake hair. So if George Bush thinks that having an iPod embargo against Great Adored Leader Kim Jong Il is a good idea, we know it's dumb and he's being a poopie head.

Quote this post ↓

CudaBoy said:

member since 19 Dec 2001 with 125 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

What a joke. Why do "we" give a hoot if Kim has toys? The guy has NUKES, yet everybody is obsessed with depriving him of TOYS?? Kim will get ANY toy he wants you know, or else y'all are naive.

Why doesn't Dubya do something useful for a change like THINK, and let's see......maybe ship Kim a billion iPods in "good faith" and let the subliminal Apple psyche do it's thing on him and whomever else is lucky enough to get an iPod as well. What, you're gonna get mad at the country that gave you the iPod (or a billion of them) ?? But no, we'll take our ball and go home. You can't play with our toys?? Give me a break folks. I'd laugh but it's not funny. For the poster that made fun of the asian accent... what's up with that?? Kim might be a nut, but his accent has nothing to do with it. Rise up peeps. d

Quote this post ↓

CudaBoy said:

member since 19 Dec 2001 with 125 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Oh yes we can.. blame DubYuh for keeping the status below quo. Every President since Eisenhower (who imposed 1st arms embargo) can influence what happened before them, Every year the sanctions are reviewed by the U.N.'s General Assembly and Bush is right there alone as usual (except for the Israeli Puppets) keeping that cowboy b.s. alive. Plus, I think the previous poster was speaking of sanctions and the worthiness of same, not Bush per sй.

Intruder wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Yet another smart move by Bush and the wise leaders of this country! Sanctions have worked so well against Cuba.

</sarcasm>

The Bush administration didn't impose the sanctions against Cuba. The Kennedy administration did. Can't blame that one on Bush.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Ronery is a quote from the movie "Team America". Get a sense of humor.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

CudaBoy wrote:
Oh yes we can.. blame DubYuh for keeping the status below quo. Every President since Eisenhower (who imposed 1st arms embargo) can influence what happened before them, Every year the sanctions are reviewed by the U.N.'s General Assembly and Bush is right there alone as usual (except for the Israeli Puppets) keeping that cowboy b.s. alive. Plus, I think the previous poster was speaking of sanctions and the worthiness of same, not Bush per sй.

Intruder wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Yet another smart move by Bush and the wise leaders of this country! Sanctions have worked so well against Cuba.

</sarcasm>

The Bush administration didn't impose the sanctions against Cuba. The Kennedy administration did. Can't blame that one on Bush.

Then also blame every administration since Kennedy: Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush 1 and Clinton. 3 dems and 4 republicans, none of whom changed the status quo. In fact, some where added in 1996 and 1998 (Clinton). Don't pick and choose your history.

Gee, the UN disagreeing with something the US does? Who could imagine that? The UN is the most useless, powerless bureaucratic institution in the world, accomplishing little to nothing in the past 30 years. They sat back and did nothing during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. 800,000 people died in that.

Anyway, enough of the politics. Sanctions will be imposed and Kim will be Kim.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Bosco wrote:
Everybody knows that George Bush is a poopie head who stole several elections dating way back to bathroom hall monitor in 3rd grade because Timmy Jones was more loved by his classmates than Georgie. Not to mention stealing the Texas governor's race from Ann Richards. There were no Republicans in Texas and we all know that Ann Richards was the best governor ever and nobody was more loved by all of Texas than Ann Richards.

Actually, Ann Richards was a very good and popular governor for Texas. But Dr. Evil (Karl Rove) did his usual polarizing & dirty tricks campaign on the part of the Clueless Jr. (Dubya), and thus he had his platform from which to run for and steal the Presidency in 2000.

Dubya can thank the following folks for promoting him far,far beyond his competency level-

- Daddy

- Karl Rove

- The Supreme Court

- Ralph Nader

- and yes, Al Gore (worst debate performances ever).

Sometimes its better to be lucky than good. Or smart. Or principled. Or competent. lol

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.