You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Apple Hit with MP3 Patent Suit

News

Apple Hit with MP3 Patent Suit

Apple, Samsung, and Sandisk are all targets of an MP3 patent infringement lawsuit, but this one isn't from Alcatel-Lucent. Instead, Texas MP3 Technologies is claiming the companies are infringing on an MP3-related patent it purchased from Sigma Tel in 2006, according to InfoWorld.

The patent in question describes "an MPEG portable sound reproducing system and a method for reproducing sound data compressed using the MPEG method."

Since the patent seems to describe devices like Apple's iPod as well as other portable MP3 players, it's unclear why other portable music player makers - like Microsoft and Creative - are not named in the suit. Presumably, other companies either found a way to work around the alleged patent infringement, or have paid licensing fees to Texas MP3 Technologies.

MP3 patent lawsuits seem to be making the rounds lately. Last week, a San Diego court ruled that Microsoft must pay Alcatel-Lucent US$1.52 billion for MP3-related patent infringements. In that case, Microsoft's lawyers claimed the company had legitimately licensed the MP3 technologies it used in Windows from the German company Fraunhofer - the company that co-developed the technology with Lucent (formerly Bell Labs).

Texas MP3 Technologies filed its suit in Marshall, Texas, which is a popular location for patent infringement cases thanks to its reputation for juries that are more likely to rule in favor of the plaintiff. Of course, Texas MP3 Technologies is asking for a jury trial.

4 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

horvatic said:

member since 27 Jun 2003 with 102 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

These lawsuits about patent infringments is really getting out of hand. Everyone thinks they own everything now and is trying to make an easy buck by going to court.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I agree with horvatic, this whole lawsuit over mp3 technology recently is just plain rediculoius, the article states "The patent in question describes "an MPEG portable sound reproducing system and a method for reproducing sound data compressed using the MPEG method." Texas MP3 Technologies is claiming the companies are infringing on an MP3-related patent it purchased from Sigma Tel in 2006, according to InfoWorld." Um, portable mp3 players have been available far earlier than 2006, and the description of the patent product is extremely vague! It would seem this would equate to "The patent in question describes "A circular device in which a user (person) contols the attitude of the vehicle in which said device is installed and a method of moving the circular device from left to right resulting in equal movement from the vehicle."" Texas MP3 Technologies seem to be reinventing the wheel to suit their needs or in this case, the MP3 player.

Guess we can thank our screwed up legal system in even allowing this lawsuit to even be filed.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

If you cant compete with them.... take them to court on a patent infringement lawsuit.

Quote this post ↓

dhp said:

member since 22 May 2003 with 182 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

"Um, portable mp3 players have been available far earlier than 2006..."

Think for a moment. They *purchased* the patent in 2006. The patent itself could be (and obviously is) dated years earlier.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.