News

TV Studios and Legacy TVs Slow HDTV

The TV business knows that most of their viewers will still be watching TV on non-HDTVs for years to come. It could take five more years before the networks fully adopt HDTV's widescreen format according to a story by Mark Cuban at DigitalMediaWire on Sunday.

Movie are always shot as if they're going to be viewed in a theater or, eventually, in a home theater. That sets the scope of the movie's wide screen aspect ratio. However, in the TV business, the frame is still designed for the millions who still have a TV with a 4x3 screen. "The conventional wisdom," Mr. Cuban wrote, "is that dramas and high end shows are shot in film while comedies are shot on HD Tape, and reality shows are regular tape. But all are shot "protected" for regular 4x3 TVs."

One network, however, has moved completely into HDTV, HDNet. All of HDNet's content is created specially for HDTV. HDTV customers, when polled, always show a preference for content shot as HD source, not upconverted from SD tape. A lot of current HD material is still created in that way.

"It's going to be interesting to see how long broadcast and cable networks pander to the 4x3 masses at the expense of those who love their shows in HD. ... it could be 5 or more years before they are willing to change the status quo," Mr. Cuban reported.

Against this background, Apple's decision to sell TV content in 640 x 480, 30fps seems completely practical. The cutoff data for analog TV is only 24 months away, and HDTV sales are booming, but the television industry still cannot afford to cater only to the eager adopters of HDTV.

2 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Biff said:

member since 08 Apr 2004 with 1479 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

"HDTV customers, when polled, always show a preference for content shot as HD source, not upconverted from SD tape."

LOL. I was thinking of polling 5.1 surround sound owners on whether they prefer surround sound or mono sound. I think the results will be very compelling.

Quote this post ↓

Nookster said:

member since 27 Oct 2004 with 93 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

This issue was completely (unwittingly?) negated years ago in the UK, nearly all TVs sold in the UK are widescreen, HD or otherwise, SD Widescreen TVs have been available for over ten years. I have a 5 year old Standard Definition Widescreen Sony CRT. In the UK Widescreen has never been a Hi-Def exclusive feature, they are two separate features in our tech timeline.

Mind you, PAL kicks NTSCs arse in terms of quality. It utilises anamorphic 16:9 very nicely, so it probably wasn't a good idea to make these two key features synonymous in the UK's instance.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.