You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Copyright Ruling May Kill Internet Radio

News

Copyright Ruling May Kill Internet Radio

A ruling to change how royalties are collected from independent Internet radio stations has the potential to drive many of the sites out of business. The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), a U.S. government agency tasked with overseeing the royalty process, decided to change the way most small Webcast stations are charged from a percentage of revenue to a pay per song and listener model.

The new royalty rates are scheduled to go into effect in about two months. If implemented, the change could increase royalty payments for the smaller stations by ten times what they are currently paying. In some cases, the new rates amount to more than a station's annual income. That translates to a substantially smaller group of available stations in iTunes' radio list.

Bill Goldsmith, owner of the Internet-based radio station Radio Paradise, hopes an agreement can be worked out to keep the small players in business.

"We are hoping that we can, along with a small group of other independent webcasters, negotiate a separate settlement with the RIAA, similar to the one we negotiated in 2002. That agreement allowed us to operate by paying a royalty equal to 10 percent to 12 percent of our gross income in performance royalties," he said on his blog. "However, that agreement has expired, and we are now liable for royalties, retroactive to the beginning of 2006, that are equal to approximately 125 percent of our income."

The new per-play fee structure was proposed to the CRB by SoundExchange, the RIAA's digital music fee collection organization. The structure includes a sliding scale that ramps up through 2010. The Radio And Internet Newsletter detailed the fees:

2006 $.0008 per performance
2007 $.0011 per performance
2008 $.0014 per performance
2009 $.0018 per performance
2010 $.0019 per performance

The Radio And Internet Newsletter's Kurt Hansen stated "Because a typical Internet radio station plays about 16 songs an hour, that's a royalty obligation in 2006 of about 1.28 cents per listener-hour. In 2006, a well-run Internet radio station might have been able to sell two radio spots an hour at a $3 net CPM (cost-per-thousand), which would add up to .6 cents per listener-hour."

He notes that even if with the potential ancillary revenue from Web site ad sales, radio sites can at best bring in about US$0.01 to $0.012 per listener-hour. In many cases, those numbers aren't enough to cover the annual royalties the new rate schedule imposes.

Internet radio listeners, many of whom are iTunes users, will notice the impact when independent radio stations in their radio list stop working. Unless, that is, the stations are able to work out an alternative agreement with the recording industry.

"We are at a fork in the road. Down one path is a radio universe populated entirely by large corporations, who can either afford the legal firepower necessary to negotiate a reasonable settlement with the music industry," said Mr. Goldsmith. "Down the other fork we are presented with a universe of choices, freely available to all, produced by people who truly love and value what they are doing."

"None of those choices are viable under the new rate structure," he said. "And that would be a tremendous loss for all involved."

8 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

I love internet radio! Would suck if this idiotic agreement killed it. I'd probably end up buying less music too, since I often hear a song I like on Internet radio and then go buy it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

How stupid can the RIAA be? Their greed will be their undoing.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

They seem very adept at shooting themselves in the foot. It appears that they attended the Harvard school of Quarterly Business; Thats where the future CEO's are taught to focus on raising the quarterly share price so they can cash out and move on to another company leaving turmoil in their wake.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Are the people outside of this the only ones with common sense here? What do this peope think that everyone is millionares and can pay such outragious fees? They're just hurting themselves in the end with less exposure for the artists they think they are protecting. The only people getting protection here is the RIAA for there greedy execs.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Well stupid is as stupid does and the RIAA is the dumbest of all!

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1922 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

The RIAA is of by and for the record companies. They don't care if they hurt the consumers, the small internet radio companies, or the artists. And frankly the record companies want to be the ones running internet radio, so if everyone else involved gets screwed, they're fine with that.

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2088 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

geoduck wrote:
The RIAA is of by and for the record companies. They don't care if they hurt the consumers, the small internet radio companies, or the artists. And frankly the record companies want to be the ones running internet radio, so if everyone else involved gets screwed, they're fine with that.

One might also consider that, in recent years, governmental policies have tended to favor big businesses over small businesses, much less individuals. I doubt that many internet radio sites give hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions to politicians.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I have written my senator and received a reply stating that she is onboard a new bill that attempts to sort this out. I to believe that the music industry shoots itself in the foot by trying to control every outlet for music. I have nearly 700 cd/albums, most bought before radio stations became automated wonders. I now buy cds on npr artist interviews or guest reviews, or if it is played by their djs. I have listened to radio stations online from other communities occaisionally, to sample blues or hawaiian and other ecletic mixes of music I enjoy. The internet mavens continually send me surveys to hone in on what I listen to and where it comes from, but the truth be told, I have never gone to one source in all my years for music, and will not be herded by the RIAA to annointed sources. If you cut down the number of places to hear music, you cut down the buzz that puts people in the stores or on the net to purchase.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.