News

Other Music Opens iPod-Compatible Digital Download Service

Other Music launched the Digital Other Music digital download store Monday, a music download service for Indie music that is compatible with Apple's iPod and any other digital media device that supports the MP3 format. The service is offering all downloads without DRM encoded as 320 kbps MP3 files, a higher bit-rate than the 256 kbps DRM-free downloads Apple will be offering from EMI in May*.

Other Music is a brick and mortar vinyl and CD store that opened in Manhattan in 1995. The company has specialized in independently released music, and the digital download store will do the same. Labels offered by the service include Warp Records, Sonic Youth Recordings (SYR), Mush Records, Kinderkore, Beggars Banquet, and other large and small independent labels.

Unlike Apple's iTunes Store, which offers largely uniform pricing, Digital Other Music has a wider range of pricing, with many albums ranging from US$9.99 to $12.99. The service also offers some tracks as album-only downloads, though the vast majority of tracks appear to be available as individual tracks.

Digital Other Music is Web-based, and the company is offering 30 second clips of each song, and a download manager for purchases. While the songs being downloaded are compatible with iPod and other digital media devices, the downloads themselves need to be added to iTunes (or other manager for other services) on your computer to be added to your iPod.

[Update: The story was edited to say that Digital Other Music's 320 Kbps is a higher bit-rate than the upcoming 256 Kbps DRM-free EMI tracks that will soon be offered by Apple. The story originally reported this as being of higher [i]quality[/i], but as noted in the comments below, comparing bit rates from different codecs is not a straight forward prospect. As of this writing, all of our readers have chimed in on the side that a 256 kbps AAC file will sound superior to a 320 kbps MP3 file. - Editor]

5 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

jimothy said:

member since 04 Jun 2004 with 567 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

320 kbps is, no question, a greater data rate than 256 kbps, but that does not mean that 320 kbps MP3 is higher quality than 256 kbs AAC. AAC is designed maintain quality at a lower bit rate than MP3s, so I wouldn't be surprised if Apple's offerings are at least as good as these MP3s.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

320k mp3 is NOT higher quality than a 256k AAC file. Perhaps the mp3 will come close to the quality of the AAC, but I doubt it. The smaller AAC is certainly going to be equal or better.

Quote this post ↓

boric*acid said:

member since 13 Jun 2006 with 28 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Add my .02¢. I am a super anal audiophile, and there's no question that AAC at 256 blows away MP3 at any reasonable bit rate. AAC is just a superior format-it preserves the middle range at a very good filesize in a way that MP3 can't. I actually rip everything to 256 AAC now and boy what a difference it makes. I'm pretty bummed though that the higher bitrate non-drm'd tracks are going to be more expensive when this is what they should have been doing all along.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Not actually true.

<i>The service is offering all downloads without DRM encoded as 320 kbps MP3 files, a higher quality than the 256 kbps DRM-free downloads Apple will be offering from EMI in May.</i>

I think it's HIGHLY debatable that 256Kbps AAC is "inferior" to 320Kbps MP3. Quite the other way round if you ask me.

Quote this post ↓

Bryan said:

member since 11 Jun 2001 with 7325 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Thanks for the comments, folks. I meant to write that the encoding was a higher bit-rate, not higher quality, but I didn't catch myself. I appreciate being kept on my toes, and the story was edited accordingly.

Also, note that we'll be talking with the folks at OM, so look for a follow up story.

Bryan

Editor

iPO

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.