News

Senate Introduces Bill to Save Internet Radio

Congressional support is growing in favor of legislation to prevent the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) from imposing cost prohibitive royalty payment rates on Internet radio stations. The latest show of support came on Thursday when U.S. Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduced a bipartisan bill to negate the CRB rate change decision and impose payment rates in line with Satellite radio. A similar bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in late April.

The CRB approved changes at the beginning of March to the royalty payment schedule imposed on Internet radio stations. The new rates were proposed by SoundExchange, the RIAA's digital music collection organization, and changed the 10 to 12 percent of gross income the stations had been paying to a pay per performance scheme. The new royalty payment plan would go into effect retroactively back to 2006 - costing most stations substantially more than their annual income. Those changes are scheduled to go into effect on July 15.

"Our bill is about standing up for folks ranging from a small Webcaster in a basement in Corvallis to an innovative startup in Beaverton," Senator Wyden said. "Keeping Internet radio alive is part of a broader issue that is important to me - keeping the e-commerce engine running by preventing discrimination against it."

Senator Brownback added "I am alarmed by the recent Copyright Royalty Board decision and the effect it will have on Internet radio - especially small Webcasters with limited revenue streams."

Without a change to the CRB many Internet radio stations will likely have to close down to avoid the skyrocketing fees, driving many to call July 15 "The day the music died."

SoundExchange, however, disagrees and went so far as to say that the House bill was catering to big corporations and that SaveNetRadio, an organization working to help keep Internet radio alive, is working to that end. John Simson, Executive Director of SoundExchange, commented "Because the bill is so heavily favored to enrich the big webcasters, it raises questions as to who is really behind the SaveNetRadio Coalition."

With similar bills making their way through Congress, it is even more likely that legislation will pass in time to change the new CRB royalty rates and prevent July 15 from being the day the music died.

3 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

I just hope that one of these senators passes the right bill that will really stop the July 15 deadline from really coming. Internet radio is a way to get new artists noticed without the big bucks. Without internet radio an essential part of the web and broadcasting on it will be lost. This is what the BIG broadcasters would love to do to the internet radio broadcasters and why the copyright board sited in there favor. They wouldn't have been so happy had they gotten such a rate hike imposed on themselves.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Does anyone understand what it means when it says

"SoundExchange, however, disagrees and went so far as to say that the House bill was catering to big corporations and that SaveNetRadio, an organization working to help keep Internet radio alive, is working to that end. John Simson, Executive Director of SoundExchange, commented "Because the bill is so heavily favored to enrich the big webcasters, it raises questions as to who is really behind the SaveNetRadio Coalition.""

I don't understand how this bill could help internet radio casters? Is there something I missed?

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2003 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote
Guest wrote:
Does anyone understand what it means when it says

"SoundExchange, however, disagrees and went so far as to say that the House bill was catering to big corporations and that SaveNetRadio, an organization working to help keep Internet radio alive, is working to that end. John Simson, Executive Director of SoundExchange, commented "Because the bill is so heavily favored to enrich the big webcasters, it raises questions as to who is really behind the SaveNetRadio Coalition.""

I don't understand how this bill could help internet radio casters? Is there something I missed?

Perhaps you haven't been following this issue. The Copyright Royalty Board decided to impose rather high royalty payments on Internet radio/streaming outlets, much higher than satellite radio or broadcast radio pay. In many cases, an outlet's payments (previously limited to a certain percentage of the outlet's gross revenue) would be larger than their total gross revenue. The CRB decision seemed specifically designed to shut down SMALL outlets, giving the advantage to large outlets and satellite radio. That's why the SoundExchange statements are so bizarre. The bill would limit the payments in a scheme similar to what was used previously.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.