You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: iPhone Could Trigger Tax Changes in UK

News

iPhone Could Trigger Tax Changes in UK

A telecom expense management consultant firm in the UK, Aurora Kendrick James (AKJ), has warned that the arrival of the iPhone in the UK might trigger a long predicted tax change for approximately 3 million mobile phone users. The story was covered by Cellular-news on Monday.

Personal Digital Assistants and BlackBerrys have already been reclassified by HM Revenues & Custom (HMRC) which said, "technology has developed to such an extent that PDAs and Blackberrys now have additional functions more typically associated with a computer and so can no longer be considered primarily as a mobile phone."

Even so, in the current tax scheme, "fully expensed mobile phones provided to staff for business use are free of income tax liability and not seen as a benefit in kind," according to Matt Atkinson from AKJ. The iPhone could change all that.

"With HMRC already bracketing PDAs and Blackberrys alongside PCs, the iPhone could be about to herald yet a further re-think of the tax situation," Mr. Atkinson warned.

The issue is related to the personal use of the phone, for example, music playing. Mobile phones used primarily for business calls are in a different class than a mobile computer with significant personal usage and hence a benefit that could be taxed.

"Motorola's Z8, Nokia's E65 and other models like them are phones packed with leisure features alongside business applications.... The line between a personal benefit and a business requirement is becoming very blurred and the taxman is without doubt watching this space," said Mr. Atkinson.

The consulatant warned his clients to be very careful when then plan to replace their business phones and take into consideration the accounting, compliance and tax implications in the UK.

6 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Tiger said:

member since 17 Jun 2003 with 1018 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

In other words, their tax code is worse than ours and they don't know what to do about taxing the iPhone to death...yet.

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2088 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Tiger wrote:
In other words, their tax code is worse than ours and they don't know what to do about taxing the iPhone to death...yet.

Employer-provided phones might be taxable in the US, as well, depending upon how they are used. It's probably just like a car: if the employer provides a car for an employee to use solely for business, it's not taxable to the employee. However, if the employee has the use of the car for other purposes, the value of that use might be taxable. If an employer-provided phone is used for personal purposes, that value might be taxable, as well. (In essence, that's what the article says about the UK.) Consult your tax advisor.

My father was a CPA and CFO of a manufacturer. The CEO of his company got into trouble with the IRS because of company-provided cars for him and his wife. As I recall, they had to pay back taxes, interest and penalties. My father had recommended to the CEO that he declare the value of the cars, but he was not the CEO's tax accountant.

Quote this post ↓

urapns said:

member since 30 Jul 2007 with 2 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Their tax code is worse than ours. We have a policy of free beverages (coffee, tea, soft drinks). Could not do this with UK group, employees would have been taxed on this...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Their taxes pay for National Health Care, which we don't have.

Quote this post ↓

Bosco said:

member since 03 Jun 2002 with 1002 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Guest wrote:
Their taxes pay for National Health Care, which we don't have.

Praise to Allah and pass the ammunition!

Quote this post ↓

LaurieF said:

member since 15 Jun 2001 with 3547 posts, TMO Forum Mod, send him a message or view his profile

Worse than the US's? No. Almost certainly simpler, in that there aren't federal *and* state *and* sales *and* sundry other taxes to pay. Different? certainly.

But the tax man cometh, no matter where one is.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.