You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: iPhone on 2.7G Network: Effective and Well Balanced

News

iPhone on 2.7G Network: Effective and Well Balanced

Many articles have criticized the UK iPhone for not being a 3G phone. However, the issue is not simply the network bandwidth, but rather what one can do with a phone that's balanced in its design and can exploit the 2.7G network, according to ITWire on Wednesday.

The first issue has to do with the iPhone's unlimited data plan. It's been overlooked that most other mobile phone companies charge their customers higher rates for mobile data. So far, AT&T and O2 charge a modest fee for unlimited data. Worse, if the iPhone were unlocked and used on another carrier's network, it would be an expensive affair.

"However, at EDGE 2.7G speeds of 70 kbps to 130 kbps (and a burst speed of 200 kbps), where you can’t download huge amounts of data anyway, the concept of 'unlimited data' for iPhone users makes perfect sense..." Alex Zaharov-Reutt wrote.

Of course, time will tell if that plan changes when a future iPhone works on a 3G network.

However, of greater importance is the utilization of the iPhone's battery. The author pointed out that his Nokia N95 tries to do too much and chews through batteries, so much so that he has to carry extra batteries and a power adapter everywhere, even in the car.

"The iPhone simply has a much better battery than the N95 in size and in being able to cope with EDGE speeds, offering day long audio, and between 5 and 7 hours if you are constantly surfing the web, constantly watching video or constantly using a combination of all the iPhone’s features. That’s certainly considerably longer than the N95 which can have it battery drained much faster with heavy use," Mr. Zaharov-Reutt observed.

The balance of the battery life against the unlimited data on Wi-Fi and 2.7G networks makes for a complete experience, not like any other mobile phone. As usual, Apple has done its homework, and competitors tend to gloss over those engineering trades that affect the user experience.

A 3G iPhone is coming, and some people will wait for it, but Apple's design decisions hardly cripple the current version in light of the problems the competition has.

5 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Sir Harry Flashman said:

member since 08 Feb 2007 with 792 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

An excellent point about the battery life of the iPhone v the Nokia and others. I got into a discussion with someone snarking about the iPhone not having a user swappable/removable battery. He was carrying two spare phone batteries, but to be sure he rarely stops talking be it on the phone or off.

What is it with cell phone model names? RAZR and Chocolate not withstanding most of them sound like Soviet Air Force aircraft names; Nokia N95, Samsung SCH-R500, LG LX160

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

O2 estimate that EDGE coverage in the UK will be approximately 30% by the iPhone's release, vs their current 3G coverage of 60% (for comparison, Three currently has 90% 3G coverage, Orange has 85%, Vodafone has "nearly 80%" and T-Mobile were on 70% at the start of the year and are aiming for 80% by the end of it). Suddenly the decision to ignore 3G in favour of EDGE doesn't look too good after all...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

It's retarded, but O2's "unlimited" plan is actually limited, but they won't tell you what the limit is. Somehow, you're supposed to guess how much 1400 web pages worth of data is, then limit the video you watch to less than that.

Quote this post ↓

deasys said:

member since 08 Apr 2003 with 296 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Guest wrote:
O2 estimate that EDGE coverage in the UK will be approximately 30% by the iPhone's release, vs their current 3G coverage of 60% (for comparison, Three currently has 90% 3G coverage, Orange has 85%, Vodafone has "nearly 80%" and T-Mobile were on 70% at the start of the year and are aiming for 80% by the end of it). Suddenly the decision to ignore 3G in favour of EDGE doesn't look too good after all...

Do you have a source for those numbers or are you just making stuff up, guest?

BTW, even if your coverage figures are correct, just 20% of UK mobile phone users have 3G-capable phones:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/technology/18cnd-iphone.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1190229211-N5MWeVgwV2P9k0N66mUs7Q

Quote this post ↓

rickcurran said:

member since 26 Sep 2006 with 12 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I have a Nokia N95 and I actually set the Network settings of the phone to use the GSM connection rather than the default AUTO setting (which chooses between 3G and GSM depending on availability), basically with it on 3G the battery goes down significantly faster. I've also had issues where I live with the 3G network failing so I've often found it more reliable to stay on the GSM network instead.

I also have no intention of using my the 3G connection (or GSM) to go online due to the crazy prices the network operators charge for data rates! The unlimited data plan for the iPhone in the UK looks to be pretty poor with it's 'unlimited' limit of 1400 pages per day! It's not unusual to encounter sites with home pages that are several hundred Kb in size, I'd really like to know what O2 consider a pages file size!

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.