News

Trademark Dispute Hampers Canadian iPhone Launch

Mention "iPhone," and most people conjure up an image of Apple's combination iPod and smart phone. The Toronto-based Comwave, however, claims it owns the trademark in Canada and wants the name associated with its voice over IP products, according to CBC News.

Comwave markets its iPhone voice over IP, or VoIP, products -- including its iPhone Mobile wireless handheld -- in 500 communities across Canada.

Apple filed a trademark application for the name "iPhone" in Canada in October 24. After the application was advertised in 2005 in accordance with Canadian requirements, Comwave filed an opposition to the application claiming it started using the name in June 2004.

According to Comwave president Yuval Barzakay, the two brands simply can't coexist north of the U.S. border. "The force they put into marketing would quickly make the brand Apple's and not ours. It's a case of hijacking the brand," Mr. Barzakay said. "If I asked people on the street who owns the iPhone trademark in Canada, they'd all say Apple. And their product isn't even in the market. So co-existence is not possible."

Apparently Comwave and Apple have been involved in discussions over the iPhone name, but the two sides have not reached an agreement. Mr. Barzakay commented "Our position is Apple has one of two choices: they can either walk away from the trademark and let us keep the iPhone name here in Canada, or they can buy the brand from us."

Should the two sides not reach an agreement, they will have to wait for the Canadian Intellectual Property Office to decide who gets to use the name in Canada.

3 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

If I understand this correctly, then Comwave has been shipping products under the name "iPhone" but doesn't have a trademark. Apple applied for the "iPhone" trademark, and Comwave protested against it.

If that is the case, then I think it would be obvious that neither company should be able to get the trademark, and both companies should be able to sell phones under the name "iPhone". Comwave messed up by not registering a trademark, and Apple messed up by using the name of an existing product.

Quote this post ↓

ctopher said:

member since 25 Aug 2006 with 123 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

IANAL

In the USA: You don't have to register a trademark to own it. That's the difference between TM and circle-R. You can put TM on anything you want to reserve as a trade mark. (although you don't have to.) You can only use the circle-R mark after the United States Patent and Trademark Office approves your application for a registered trademark.

I believe the keys are, you have to USE the mark for goods and services and you have to be first.

So if Canada is similar, the fight will be, who used it first and was that use legitimate.

Some info is here:

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/doc/basic/register.htm

The situation appears to be similar in Canada.

http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrksv/cipo/tm/tm_gd_basic-e.html#section04

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1865 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Actually I'm surprised that Apple hasn't run into this more. iPhone seems like an obvilus name for a VOIP service.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.