News

Analyst: iPhone Could Dictate Fate of Apple

The iPhone is such a highly visible product, and Apple's sales projections so important, that Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein Research believes that it could become crucial to the future of the company, for good or bad, according to MarketWatch on Friday.

One driver, according to Mr. Sacconaghi, is the major contribution of the iPhone to Apple's sales growth, accounting for a fourth of total sales within four years. Secondly, the high gross profit margin of the iPhone, 55-60 percent, compared to the rest of Apple's products, 30-33 percent, could be responsible for about 80 percent of Apple's earnings growth.

On the other hand, there are some emerging issues that could be a source of concern. "While we believe the iPhone has the potential to drive material earnings growth for Apple, recent data points suggest the business is facing two significant challenges: (1) overall demand for the handset appears to be falling short of expectations; and (2) the incidence of 'unlocking' has been much higher than expected," Mr. Sacconaghi wrote in a recent report.

The unlocking issue isn't related to sales, rather, it's related to the loss of additional shared revenue when an iPhone is sold through an authorized partner. It can be compared to the movie industry where movie sales could be booming, but investors feverishly focus on the lost sales opportunities caused by pirating.

"On balance, we believe Apple is now reasonably to attractively valued, especially in light of the company's strong free cash flow generation," wrote Mr. Sacconaghi. "However, we remain worried that the near-term news flow on iPod and iPhone could be incrementally negative." He gave AAPL a neutral rating.

The recent tumble of Apple's share price has been driven by many factors: disaffection with hightech stocks and worries about the U.S. economy. Even so, Apple has some challenges to face to restore investor confidence that the company can navigate through the sticky issues of unlocked phones, pricing, solid sales projections, and a seamless introduction of next generation phones.

Because lost revenue due to iPhone unlocking is such a strategic issue, Mr. Sacconaghi believes that Apple will either have to worker harder to keep the iPhone locked, or, alternatively, accept the situation and sell an unlocked version -- one in which associated carrier revenue is not expected.

8 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

algr said:

member since 07 Aug 2003 with 277 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Unlocking an iPhone is similar to the people who bought Xbox 1 or PS2s and installed linux on them in order to use those units as cheep PCs. Unlike iPhones, Microsoft and Sony actually LOOSE money when someone buys a console and then doesn't buy any games. This issue proved to be too geeky a specialty situation to really hurt the big picture, and I think it will be the same for the iPhone. The PS3 now actually supports putting linux on it - there is a menu item labeled "install OS".

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Most of the unlocked iPhones are where there is not a Carrier that sells it. I think in every country where the iPhone is "legally" sold, most of the user have a contract with the official carrier.

If the overall rate of unlocked iPhone is 1 on 4 (approximately) that's not the rate in US or Germany. I've read that there are 3 to 500.000 iPhones in China only. That's more than 30% of unlocked units.

If we could have an official Carrier in Italy, I'd buy an "official" iPhone right away, instead of using an unlocked one, with all the troubles every time a new firmware or bootloader comes out...

Quote this post ↓

Wings said:

member since 30 Mar 2004 with 85 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

The vast majority of those unlocked phones are going to countries where the iPhone has no supporting carrier. So how is it that an unlocked phone represents a loss of revenue? At least Apple is getting the profit from selling one, where if it were not possible to unlock an iPhone, they wouldn't be selling in China and Apple would have no profit at all. I ain't buyin the loss of revenue theory.

Quote this post ↓

Tiger said:

member since 17 Jun 2003 with 904 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I think the whole premise of "the fate of the iPhone dictates the fate of Apple" is ridiculous. Mac hardware sales are soaring, switching is becoming de rigeur, and the iPhone plan is so drawn out on subscriptions, it could be years before the real profits from it come in.

In other words, the author is placing way too much emphasis on one aspect, and forgetting about all the others that affect Apple's bottom line.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I am guessing that if someone looks back through analyst articles from a couple years ago, there was a similar article written about how Apples fate is now tied to the iPod.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Sacconaghi's comments have been splattered in blog after blog and his 'analysis' has been discredited over and over again.

To get an idea of his 'analysis' look at his comment (more completely shown in other articles) that 'in FOUR YEARS time iPhone sales will make up 80% of Apple's revenue growth'. Really? T.S has some kind of crystal ball? He knows for sure for FOUR years Apple won't have any new innovative products that might be more profitable or add to the revenue stream? Less than ONE YEAR ago there was NO Iphone on sale, no iPod Touch, no Leopard, no Video Ipod Nanos, no Movie Rentals, no MacBook Air and yet Sacconaghi can predict Apple's revenue growth in FOUR YEARS time 80% will be Iphones! Wow! So Apple is going to stand still for four years? If Sacc. is so prescient he can predict percentages of Apple revenue streams (and new products) four years from now he should be richer than Warren Buffett.

Bizzare thing is that people keep repeating Sacc.'s comments without questioning his numbers.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

He may have calculated the iPhone margin four years from now, taking into account revenue (sharing) from carriers to be 80%.

Then he must have thought he was actually computing the revenue contribution from iPhone. With Mac sales growing 25% to 30% per year, in four years we will be looking at an increase of 300% in computer sales. This is not even accounting for new products which will address additinal markets, such as a tablet.

I wish these guys would post their calculations along with their opinions.

Quote this post ↓

deasys said:

member since 08 Apr 2003 with 243 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

That "analyst" already has an fitting nickname: Toni "The Tool" Sacconaghi. By repeating his idiocy here, John, you're coming dangerously close to taking on the same epithet for yourself...

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.