You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Congressman Proposes Bill to Require Contract-Free Phones

News

Congressman Proposes Bill to Require Contract-Free Phones

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has proposed a sweeping bill to alter the terms on which customers purchase mobile phones. The "Wireless Consumer Protection and Community Broadband Empowerment Act of 2008" recognizes that wireless service has become a replacement for traditional phone service for millions of Americans and seeks to require broader disclosure of fees and terms, require plans with no early termination fee, proration of plans that do have termination fees, offer a contract-free non-subsidized phone and a host of other remedies that seek to address practices in the mobile phone industry.

Rep, Markey is the chairman of the House telecommunications and Internet committee. Hearings on the bill start on Wednesday.

The mobile phone carriers have responded, according to C|Net, by saying that the early termination fee is necessary to offset the cost of subsidized phones. Accordingly, the Markey proposed bill would require carriers to offer a non-subsidized phone.

The proposed legislation mirrors the rules that have been in force in Europe for some time.

Seeing the handwriting on the wall, some carriers, including AT&T, have already announced plans to prorate termination fees. That move is probably intended to serve as evidence that the mobile phone industry can regulate itself. Rep. Markey's proposed legislation however goes into much greater detail to protect the interests of the consumers. No doubt that the CTIA and the carriers will fight this bill, but the weight of time, the dependence of so many Americans on cell phones and the precedent in Europe all portend a sea change in the way Americans purchase mobile phones.

3 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

What has taken so looooooooooong........? I can still go to Europe and buy a phone and bring it back to the US cheaper than I can buy the same phone in the US baring IPhones of course.

Quote this post ↓

mahuti said:

member since 09 Jan 2003 with 377 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

Hah hah... termination fees for subsidized phones. I don't even get subsidized phones from these companies because I don't like the phones they offer... so why should I get a termination fee?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Isn't this a solution in search of a problem? I might be mistaken, but aren't pay-as-you-go phones already available from cell providers? I subject myself to a contract to get a reduced rate on minutes.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.