News

The Register: Apple's PA Semi Purchase Insane Unless Examined Deeper

The likelihood that Apple purchased PA Semi as an avenue to their own low power iPhone or MID device successor is slim, according to The Register on Wednesday. However, Apple may have something else up its sleeve.

"US$278M fails to buy a world-class mobile chip arsenal in this day and age," wrote Ashlee Vance. In essence, Apple would be crazy try try to replace the future Intel chips for future iPhones with this company because of its track record and current roadmap. It would take years for that company, which never had a chip that could replace the current ARM processor Apple uses, to develop one.

Apple is not unfamiliar with PA Semi and has had dealings with them before when they were investigated as a potential successor to the PowerPC chips. Apple is back, not for what everyone thinks, the author wrote, because such a small company couldn't possible compete with Intel's offerings for a future CPU like the Atom. And if PA Semi were a real powerhouse, it would have hardly sold out so early and for so little.

"This strategy makes more sense than the mobile line being peddled elsewhere. After all, Apple's not really the engineering genius that it claims. Intel, for example, did the majority of the work around the MacBook Air, which is why you saw Lenovo, another Intel customer, release the very similar X300 just a couple of weeks after Apple's grand launch," Ms. Vance wrote. "Apple did little more than excise an Ethernet port and slap a white case on the unit. Apple is not an innards expert, so the idea of it getting into the microprocessor business simply to "gain a competitive design edge" is ludicrous.

What is does get Apple is some expertise in other consumer electronics areas related to, possibly, next generation Apple TV or other new consumer products. Seen in that light, Apple's acquisition makes a lot more sense.

6 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Dreadnought said:

member since 01 Jan 2005 with 159 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote
"Apple did little more than excise an Ethernet port and slap a white case on the unit. Apple is not an innards expert, so the idea of it getting into the microprocessor business simply to "gain a competitive design edge" is ludicrous.

Has this silly bint ever looked at a MacBook Air? Whatever she writes from this moment forward has absolutely NO credibility whatsoever.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Apple is not an innards expert? is this person smoking crack? If im not mistaken, before Intel, Apple did design their own boards, as well as the housing and cooling for such complex beasts as the G5 tower.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Indeed. The "innards" comment really shatters her ethos. It doesn't seem like this person follows developments at Apple or the microprocessor segment.

Nevertheless, it is probably correct that this purchase is not about unseating Intel, even though Apple has been moving progressively toward more hardware abstraction. PA Semi has no fabs. At most, this is a design team. I'd look for its influence in platforms like Apple TV and possibly embedded portables like the iPod line. One wonders if perhaps this acquisition might have to do with hardware accelerators (such as video decoders) other than mainboard processors.

Quote this post ↓

deasys said:

member since 08 Apr 2003 with 243 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Vance's comments are ridiculous.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

People named "Ashlee" rarely make intelligent comments, and this one proves the rule.

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2003 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
People named "Ashlee" rarely make intelligent comments, and this one proves the rule.

Interesting. Any evidence for that assertion? Just what does a person's name--which she very likely did not choose, herself--have to do with making intelligent comments? Does the fact that it is a woman's name have something to do with your assertion?

OTOH, after several years on these forums (and others--I've been online since 1985), I've noted that people named "Guest" rarely make intelligent comments.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.