News

Tennessee Considers "iPod Tax"

Tennessee is considering supplementing its revenue shortfall with a tax on digital downloads. The state's Digital Products/iPOD Tax, which is part of the "Technical Corrections" bill, is still in preliminary stages and plans to include nearly any type of digital media download.

According to an analysis by attorneys at the Nashville-based Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis law firm, the bill "would subject downloaded sales of digital media, including music videos, motion pictures, news and entertainment programs, music, ringtones, electronic books, etc. to the retail sales tax."

At least for now, it appears that software downloads are safe from the proposed tax.

The proposed legislation hasn't been presented to Tennessee lawmakers yet, but that's not stopping some from critisizing the move.

"Most states do not tax digitally-deliverd products," said state communications director Bill Hobbs. "Tennessee shouldn't either and state government's current fiscal crisis should not be used by the Bredesen administration as an excuse to hit the people of Tennessee with a new tax that could cost them tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars."

Apparently the state is facing a US$500 million budget deficit and is looking every place it can for additional revenue, according to WDEF News 12. Should the digital download tax find its way into law, it likely won't site well with the state's consumers or the companies that provide the content facing taxation.

12 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

Bosco said:

member since 03 Jun 2002 with 971 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Good luck to the great state of Tennessee collecting their tax! Since I have no nexus there, I sure as hell won't be reporting sales or collecting taxes for them. Losers.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

When I get to vote in Tennessee, they can collect taxes from me. Until then, it is "taxation without representation". In addition, the Federal Mail Order law specifically denies states the right to collect taxes on interstate commerce. The only exception is when the provider has a physical presence in the state, and therefore, is no longer interstate commerce. Whenever a state law is in conflict with a Federal law, the Federal law trump it.

Quote this post ↓

jbruni said:

member since 14 Jul 2006 with 73 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

won't site well?

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

An iPod tax, eh? This is the kind of bold, innovative thinking that got Tennessee $500 million in debt to begin with. The governor will probably veto it, but should be amusing to watch the antics of the techno-ignorant who support this bill as they try to convince people they know what they're doing

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

A guest said: "taxation without representation"

I don't see anything that implies non-residents of Tennessee would have to pay the tax (unless the purchase is made in Tennessee).

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Our state did it with a cigarette tax that raised the price to just under $6 a pack. The money was earmarked for the general fund. Then 6 months later they passed a law forbidding smoking in bars and other public areas. The thing is, 35 percent quit smoking. Even more buy them illegally and several bars and casinos have closed due to lack of smokers. Now they're a huge shortfall on the proposed tax and are reviewing credit card purchases and cars entering the state to get their tax. Gotta love a police state.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

"Our state did it with a cigarette tax"

I live in Iowa, we did a similar thing with similar results, although you can still smoke in casinos due to the taxes that they pay. Makes you wonder just where the money is going. Maybe we could cut our spending instead of taxing the poor. As long as they target the rights of the few they'll keep taxing them. The rich and the educated won't care, afterall it's taxing things that they don't do.

Quote this post ↓

geoduck said:

member since 30 Dec 2003 with 1668 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Yeah they need to tax it by the acre-foot of data that goes through them Internet Pipes.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 2843 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
"Our state did it with a cigarette tax"

I live in Iowa, we did a similar thing with similar results, although you can still smoke in casinos due to the taxes that they pay. Makes you wonder just where the money is going. Maybe we could cut our spending instead of taxing the poor. As long as they target the rights of the few they'll keep taxing them. The rich and the educated won't care, afterall it's taxing things that they don't do.

'cause I've never seen a rich or educated person smoke or gamble...

Didn't know that smoking was a "right", either.

Quote this post ↓

tthomcarl said:

member since 24 Mar 2006 with 4 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Several years ago TN attempted something similar to this, since I have relatives in TN I had intended to retire their, it's a beautiful state. Upon learning of TN intention to tax internet use, I sent the Governors office an email to let them know that I had changed my plans and TN was off of my list because of their attempt to tax the internet. I got 5 pages of pure political drivel about a week later asking me to reconsider my choice of retirement location, my reply was a politically incorrect rant as to the lack of integrity in government.

Quote this post ↓

tytrumpet said:

member since 28 Apr 2008 with 1 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Gee, A lot of good Al Gore is (former Senator from TN) on that board if that passes. Maybe he can really do something for apple (and others) now and have that legislation zapped.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

The "$500 million budget deficit " is a crock. The Bredesen administration "wants" an additional $500 mil over last years budget. Why would Tennessee NEED a ballroom(bunker) in the Governor's Mansion?? Check NY Times article "Plans for Annex to Governor’s Mansion Draw Critics".

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.