You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Roku Exec: Netflix Box Can do High-Def

News

Roku Exec: Netflix Box Can do High-Def

On Tuesday, Netflix announced a $99 box that connects to the Internet and a TV and allows some Netflix subscribers to watch unlimited movies. Currently, Netflix is only offering Standard Definition content, but the chief executive of Roku has said that if Netflix offered it, the box can output High Definition video.

Anthony Wood told the AP that if Neflix elected to offer it, the box would output HD. The problem is that, like the Apple TV, a recommended speed for that service is 6 Mbps or more, and most U.S. households don't have that capability.

Another factor is that the Apple TV has a hard disk, which makes it less susceptible to the speed of the Internet connection. That hard disk also makes it possible to stop and back up during the stream. Without a hard disk, which allows it to be less expensive, that's a lot harder on the Roku box. It can take the Roku box up to a minute to "find its place" in those operations.

Mr. Wood added that the unit can also play Dolby 5.1 Surround sound if Netflix provided it, but that is also not currently broadcast.

Netflix subscribers who are currently paying at least US$8.99/month have unlimited access to a subset of the 80,000 title Netflix library, about 10,000 movies.

While Netflix can always choose to add HD and Dolby 5.1 in the future, customers who have a fast Internet connection, 6+ Mbps, could find the Roku box, with no hard disk for buffering, a bit inconvenient compared to the Apple TV -- which does offer some HD movies already. However, the Netflix library of available SD movies is much larger, and there's that magical price: US$99.00.

2 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

deasys said:

member since 08 Apr 2003 with 296 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

That magical price of $99 is too high for something that is bound to provide a low quality, frustrating experience.

Quote this post ↓

mahuti said:

member since 09 Jan 2003 with 377 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

In my experience, the quality has been excellent. Though not 'hi-def' which I'm not a big fan of anyway because it's such a PITA, the on-line video content has been of much higher quality than I expected. Additionally, it hasn't been frustrating at all. Remarkably simple and straight-forward. The only frustrating part of the online service thus-far has been having to use IE on Windows to use it.

I don't think $99 is too high. I think it's a pretty decent price, really, for on-demand services that piggy-back off of an already reasonably priced service.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.