You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Not So Fast: New iPhone Means Higher Costs, Same Speeds, for Some

Analysis

Not So Fast: New iPhone Means Higher Costs, Same Speeds, for Some

Current iPhone owners in the U.S. who are thinking about upgrading to a new iPhone to take advantage of the faster 3G network may wind up paying more for what they already have.

AT&T's 3G coverage map reveals its 3G coverage is spotty, concentrated in major metropolitan areas around the country. We stitched together this map using the coverage tool from AT&T's Web site. The dark blue patches indicate areas where the 3G network is available. For the vast majority of the country -- geographically, at least -- 3G is unavailable.

That means many new iPhone owners will be paying for 3G speeds they may never see. According to AT&T, there is only one data plan for the new phone: $30/month will get you 3G speeds where available; 2G (or EDGE) speeds elsewhere. Current iPhone owners pay $20/month for their data plan, which also includes 200 SMS messages (something that will cost new iPhone customers an additional $5.)


Few and far between: AT&T's 3G network remains clustered in major metropolitan areas.

AT&T says its 3G network is growing quickly. "We are in 280 major metropolitan areas now and will be in 350 by the end of the year," AT&T's Mark Siegel told The Mac Observer. Siegel, AT&T's executive director of media relations, said the company thinks that "folks who buy the new iPhone have an excellent chance of being in an area our 3G network covers." Unless, that is (according to AT&T's own map), they live in Iowa, Nebraska either of the Dakotas, Wyoming, Montana or the more rural areas of just about every other state in the union.

Of course, Siegel points out, "if you go to in an area that is 2G, the iPhone will work there as well." That's likely to be little consolation to customers who don't just go to areas with no 3G coverage, but live and work in them as well. For those customers, the 2G data plan has just effectively gone up by $10 a month ($15 if they still want 200 SMS messages per month.)

So, what's an iPhone owner (or prospective owner) to do? For those who live in areas with good 3G coverage, the increased speed may be well worth the extra cost. For current iPhone owners not within AT&T's 3G network, you may want to hang on to your old iPhone: unless GPS is critical to you, the 2.0 software update should give you everything else the new iPhone offers except the plastic back and metal buttons.

The news may be worst for those in non-3G areas who held off on buying a first-gen iPhone. They'll be paying more for the same old EDGE speeds early adopters have been getting for a year. Even AT&T's spokesperson seemed to have a hard time putting a positive spin on this one: "It is their call as to whether or not the iPhone 3G will meet their needs."

In the case of the iPhone, it could be a case of good things coming to those who don't wait.

18 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

deasys said:

member since 08 Apr 2003 with 296 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Where was this article when seemingly everyone was clamoring for 3G and holding off original iPhone purchases as a result?

You wanted it, you got it...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Fortunately here in europe the 3G network is really ubiquitous, we were waiting the 3G iPhone in suspence. Now here it is...

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

All AT&T has to do is offer, but they never will, is a NON-3G data plan at the old rates with messaging. If you want 3G then you pay an additional $10 plus the SMS charge.

To me SMS is crap. for me I'll use the AOL's AIM program they show when v2.0 was announced. If Apple or AT&T tries to block that program the yelling and screaming will be more than they can handle.

Quote this post ↓

cpetrauskas said:

member since 08 Oct 2004 with 1 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

"-- geographically, at least -- " Right so this article is neither news nor analysis if you are trying to illustrate impact on users. The surface of the earth is not the network client, individual people are. Unless you are going to correlate those shaded areas to population, you've told us nothing. It's like a sentence that gets cut off in th

Quote this post ↓

Sir Harry Flashman said:

member since 08 Feb 2007 with 792 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I wonder how it would look if that nighttime satellite view of the USA was overlaid on that map. Not to disparage the rural areas, but it looks to me that current 3G coverage correlates to where most people live.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Sir Harry Flashman wrote:
I wonder how it would look if that nighttime satellite view of the USA was overlaid on that map. Not to disparage the rural areas, but it looks to me that current 3G coverage correlates to where most people live.
No doubt, but there are a lot of places in the country where you now have to pay extra for a service you can't get. Not cool.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Anonymous wrote:
Sir Harry Flashman wrote:
I wonder how it would look if that nighttime satellite view of the USA was overlaid on that map. Not to disparage the rural areas, but it looks to me that current 3G coverage correlates to where most people live.
No doubt, but there are a lot of places in the country where you now have to pay extra for a service you can't get. Not cool.

Then maybe the iPhone isn't the best choice for folks who live in those areas? But this really isn't an iPhone issue, it is an ATT issue.

Quote this post ↓

Sir Harry Flashman said:

member since 08 Feb 2007 with 792 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Intruder wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Sir Harry Flashman wrote:
I wonder how it would look if that nighttime satellite view of the USA was overlaid on that map. Not to disparage the rural areas, but it looks to me that current 3G coverage correlates to where most people live.
No doubt, but there are a lot of places in the country where you now have to pay extra for a service you can't get. Not cool.

Then maybe the iPhone isn't the best choice for folks who live in those areas? But this really isn't an iPhone issue, it is an ATT issue.

Profits are a factor. Does AT&T want to put out the expense of installing 3G systems in places where they will not get much of a financial return. I could have also suggested overlaying a map of the Apple Retail Stores. This stuff takes time as well as money, the cities had electricity service long before the Rural Electrification Act brought it to the farms and ranches. I remember reading that the Governor of South or North Dakota suggested high flying balloons over the state to provide cell service; Cheaper than installing towers and the line of site coverage would great.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I was actually fine with my iPhone data plan doubling in price. It seemed worth it for 3G speeds. But also taking away my 200 text messages and charging $5/month to get them back really bugs me.

I was going to buy a new iPhone immediately, but not anymore. I use Google Reader for almost all my web stuff, which actually works pretty well with Edge. Apple & AT&T are pushing this one too far, and I'm not going along with it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Sorry, should have said adding $10 to my $20 data plane, not doubling it. With the new $5 SMS charge, my costs go from $20 to $35. Charging $5 now for just $200 SMSs is a weasel move, IMO. I'm a huge iPhone advocate, and have in effect sold many of them with my recommendations and personal demos. But this nickel & dime surcharge on basic SMS absolutely rubs me the wrong way, and I won't be upgrading my iPhone for a while.

Quote this post ↓

TosaDeac said:

member since 05 Feb 2008 with 16 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I agree with the very first post, congrats on getting your wish, here is a 3G iPhone, but you can't use it unless you live in a big city. Really the 3G iPhone is more about international sales anyway where 3G is the norm. Imagine how scarse the coverage would have been a year ago when everyone wanted 3G in the first version of the iPhone!

I'm happy with my iPhone and the data plan I have. I always viewed it as a bargain, and now it truly is looking that way. Also I'm glad I won't be tempted to upgrade to the 3G now, instead I can wait for the next version...can we start talking about that one now or is it too early?

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Anonymous wrote:
Sorry, should have said adding $10 to my $20 data plane, not doubling it. With the new $5 SMS charge, my costs go from $20 to $35. Charging $5 now for just $200 SMSs is a weasel move, IMO. I'm a huge iPhone advocate, and have in effect sold many of them with my recommendations and personal demos. But this nickel & dime surcharge on basic SMS absolutely rubs me the wrong way, and I won't be upgrading my iPhone for a while.

Again, this is an issue with AT&T, not Apple nor the iPhone. Complain to AT&T.

Quote this post ↓

h-dog said:

member since 11 Jul 2005 with 12 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Actually, on one level this is an issue with AT&T, but on another, it's an issue with the US. The fact that our political system is so worthless that corporations pretty much dictate what policies and laws they want means that we wind up with crappy availability and exorbitant prices for services that are rapidly becoming necessary. The rest of the world takes for granted things that we would be amazed at. Apple are not fools - they are looking at what's happening here in the states, what's happening to our economy, and what's happening to the dollar, and probably came to the realization that designing devices solely for the US market is not a road to success. The 3G iPhone is targeted towards much more than just the US. What AT&T decides to charge is pretty much out of Apple's hands - they already forced AT&T into a flat rate for network access and you can bet AT&T can't wait to get out of that agreement.

So if you feel that wireless companies are getting away with murder, maybe you should take a good long look at what candidate you are supporting in the upcoming elections and think whether our markets may need a bit of regulation on occasion.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I think 3G was mostly needed to make the iPhone a success here in Europe too, where up until now it was selling ok, but was a disappointment compared to the sales in the U.S.

And like the poster on the top said, 3G-coverage in Europe excellent.

Also, they couldn't have entered the Japanese market without it.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

From the perspective of an iPhone early adopter, the 3G announcements (and deception by omission) are indeed disappointing. After all of Steve Jobs' crowing about how he shifted the paradigm of wireless in favor of consumers, the fact that he has rolled over for ATT is kinda embarrassing. Nowhere in his keynote do I remember him saying, "by the way, you current iPhone users can pay 200 bucks for our new phone, pay $120 bucks extra each year for data- oh yeah, and we're taking away your SMS messages, so make that $180 bucks extra a year if you want to keep what you already have".

Steve, I love you, but you can be an utter coward sometimes. Leaving it to ATT to give everyone the bad news- cowardly.

Quote this post ↓

Intruder said:

member since 07 Jul 2004 with 3149 posts, TMO Mac Specialist, send him a message or view his profile

Anonymous wrote:
From the perspective of an iPhone early adopter, the 3G announcements (and deception by omission) are indeed disappointing. After all of Steve Jobs' crowing about how he shifted the paradigm of wireless in favor of consumers, the fact that he has rolled over for ATT is kinda embarrassing. Nowhere in his keynote do I remember him saying, "by the way, you current iPhone users can pay 200 bucks for our new phone, pay $120 bucks extra each year for data- oh yeah, and we're taking away your SMS messages, so make that $180 bucks extra a year if you want to keep what you already have".

Steve, I love you, but you can be an utter coward sometimes. Leaving it to ATT to give everyone the bad news- cowardly.

WTF are you talking about? Did anybody (Apple? SJ? AT&T?) make a promise that has since been broken?

The 3G iPhone is being released in 22 countries simultaneously. Why should SJ address only one carriers plan?

Nobody is making you buy a new phone. If you don't like the plan, don't buy the new phone. If enough people don't buy the phone, AT&T will be foreced to change the plan to increase sales.

People's sense of entitlement is absolutely astonishing.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I saw an interview with an AT&T customer rep on another site, and they said they will NOT charge that extra $10 for folks whose primary residence is not covered by 3G, you will only get upgraded when it becomes available.

Geez, use a little common sense, folks, what makes you think they would MAKE you get a plan you can't use?

idiots.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

What about Alaska. We got AT&T cell coverage back in October 2007. (You know, that bastard state not considered part of the "Continental US" by shippers and surprisingly cold even though it is placed "left of Mexico")

John in North Pole

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.