You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: RIAA Declares AM-FM Radio Stations Pirates

News

RIAA Declares AM-FM Radio Stations Pirates

For 80 years, terrestrial radio stations have legally played music without paying royalties on the principle that listeners who hear a song they like will go buy it. The record industry, facing declining revenues, wants to reverse that law and, accordingly, the RIAA has declared that radio stations are pirates because they don't pay those royalties.

The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has been opposing this initiative and has been seeking the support of members of Congress to block any legislation that would change the status quo. The counter comes in the form of the Local Radio Freedom Act which now has the majority of the House of Representatives supporting it.

On Tuesday, NAB Executive Vice President Dennis Wharton referring to the majority House support said, "Today's announcement sends a powerful message to foreign-owned record labels that Congress is not falling for their bogus campaign to blame local radio stations for their financial woes....

"NAB thanks those members of Congress who appreciate the fact that free radio airplay of music generates untold millions into the wallets of performers and record labels. We will continue to educate policymakers on the devastating impact this RIAA tax would have on America's hometown radio stations."

Mr. Wharton has pointed out the key objections to any royalty legislation. First, small hometown radio stations cannot afford the royalty fees which, once enacted, are bound to rise and put them out of business. More importantly, however, the move by the RIAA is seen by the NAB as a funds transfer from local radio stations to foreign owned music labels who are desperate to bring a halt to declining music revenues.

The RIAA argues that everyone else who broadcasts music to the public pays royalties, so the local radio stations should as well. The NAB argues that the free publicity music gets on the radio generates compensating revenues estimated at US$2.4B a year.

"It's a form of piracy, if you will, but not in the classic sense as we think of it," said Martin Machowsky, a spokesperson for musicFirst, a coalition that seeks fairness in radio. "Nobody listens to the radio for the commercials."

musicFirst has links that inform radio listeners about the royalty issues.

1 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

This is a fascinating argument, particularly when you contrast it with the record labels repeated payola scandals, where they paid millions of dollars to radio stations to get their songs played on the radio. I guess radio has radically changed in the three years since the last payola scandal?

I guess they just want some of their payola back... And the odds that artists see any of this money, 0.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.