You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: Norway Gives Apple November 3rd Deadline to Respond to DRM Allegations

News

Norway Gives Apple November 3rd Deadline to Respond to DRM Allegations

Apple Inc. has until November 3rd to respond to allegations that it is in violation of Norwegian law when it comes to selling DRM-controlled music on the Norwegian iTunes Store. Consumer Ombudsman Bjoern Erik Thon said he and his fellow regulators in the EU had agreed Norway would be the venue for a test case on the issue.

Mr. Thon said that Apple has had two years to work out a solution that would allow iTunes downloads to work on any digital media device, and that its failure to do so could be a violation of Norwegian law.

"It's a consumer's right to transfer and play digital content bought and downloaded from the Internet to the music device he himself chooses to use. iTunes makes this impossible or at least difficult, and hence, they act in breach of Norwegian law," Mr. Thon told the AP.

FairPlay

At issue is Apple's DRM scheme that controls where most iTunes downloads can be played. Called FairPlay, this scheme limits the number of times an iTunes playlist can be burned, and limits playback of the download to iTunes on up to five Windows PCs or Macs, or on an iPod or iPhone.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs has said in response to this issue in the past that Apple's hands were tied, and that it was the labels that require DRM. According to Mr. Jobs' version of the story, Apple wants to sell songs without DRM, and reached an agreement with EMI, alone of the major record labels, to do just that.

Mr. Jobs said in an open letter published in February of 2007 that having a DRM scheme was at the behest of the music labels, who agreed to license their music catalogs to Apple with the caveat that they be controlled.

"A key provision of our agreements with the music companies," wrote Mr. Jobs, "is that if our DRM system is compromised and their music becomes playable on unauthorized devices, we have only a small number of weeks to fix the problem or they can withdraw their entire music catalog from our iTunes store."

Since Steve Jobs wrote that letter, Apple and EMI began offering DRM-free tracks from that company's label, but the other major labels have not followed suit, even though they have offered uncrippled licenses to Amazon and other iTunes competitors.

It has been widely speculated in tech news outlets, blogs, and even the mainstream press that the labels have done this in order to put the hurt on iTunes, and lessen Apple's strong position in the market. Few record execs have enjoyed having Apple have such a strong position in dictating their business terms.

So far, however, iTunes has remained the market leader, even with most of its offerings being crippled by DRM.

Whither the Labels?

In Mr. Thon's frequent public comments on this issue during the last two years, the focus of his ire has been Apple. According to Mr. Thon, Apple needs to make iTunes downloads portable everywhere, and scant public pressure has come from his office, or the office of other EU regulators, on the labels for requiring the crippled downloads.

With Steve Jobs saying that his company can not license FairPlay to any and all comers because Apple would be responsible when and if it was broken, and the labels seemingly intent on making Apple the only major digital music vendor saddled with the DRM requirement, it is unclear where Norway's cause will head or how it will be resolved.

One thing is clear, however, and that is Mr. Thon has the ability to take the case to Norway's Market Council, a regulatory agency with all the power needed to force a company to change its trade practices within Norway's borders. The broader EU will also be watching the case closely.

5 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

JonGl said:

member since 12 Jan 2006 with 113 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I sure hope that Apple simply pulls out of Norway. This is just childish on their part. I have a Palm Treo, a Sansa, and two other mp3 players, and every one of them is playing music we've bought on the Apple store. And all the songs are mp3 format. Big hairy deal. Get a life Mr. Thon. Or better yet, ask you children how to do it--I presume _they_ at least have a life.

-Jon

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Not only that, but there is at least one third-party product available that will strip out DRM, so you don't have to burn your toons to a CD then re-rip them. This case will go nowhere.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I would suggest that Bj?rn Erik Thorn start using a Mac to see how many obstacles we are presented to here in Norway, from monopolist services which seems to be all sold to Microsoft. I would have taken this more serious if his office would have stood up just once for our rights as consumers, but no Sir. Not a word has been heard then. I guess that must be because they all use Windows PCs and havenʼt felt how life can be outside the great prison. They have Windows for walls in there:)

Quote this post ↓

gopher said:

member since 28 Mar 2002 with 291 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

"only major digital music vendor saddled with the DRM requirement"? Only? What weed is he smoking? Microsoft has been given a DRM requirement which forces the vast majority of books on tapes converted, Netflix videos, etc to not be usable on Macs. Hello? Apple is no more guilty than Microsoft. Of course Microsoft has enjoyed a monopoly on a much larger range of hardware than Apple has. And Apple has opened its hardware to support Microsoft's monopoly, but those who can't afford to upgrade are stuck in the cold without any access to any of the larger DRM. Hrmm...unless vendors start offering free upgrades, or the governments do, no DRM is going to be truly open.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I am wondering if Apple's contract with the record labels has any of the usual clauses about parts of the contract being against any laws. So if a Norwegian court decided that selling music with DRM is against Norwegian laws, that might not be any problem for Apple at all, but allow them to turn DRM off in the Norwegian iTMS without violating any of their contracts with the record companies.

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.