You're viewing an article in iPO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site: iPhone Whine and Cheese

Column

Just a Thought - iPhone Whine and Cheese

This is the fifth time I've rewritten this article. I didn't like the first four efforts because they made me sound like either a puling Apple hater or an Apple apologist.

I like to think that I'm neither. When Apple does something good then I should write about it as quickly as I might if they've done something stupid. At least, that's what I've aimed for.

The reason I'm having such a hard time committing to what I want to say is that, in essence, I'm not sure what it is I want to say.

I know what I want to talk about is the iPhone and the environment Apple has carefully built around it, and I believe the reason I can't settle on any one thing to praise or complain about is because there is no one thing I can praise about the iPhone that I can't also complain about.

For example, the iPhone 3G has a GPS receiver built in and it works great with Google maps and other applications that make use of it, but it doesn't offer compass headings, so some really cool applications, even true turn-by-turn navigation is missing.

Another example is the iPhone's ability to use information between applications. I can touch a phone number in my email and it is dialed, touch an address in my address book and a map showing the address location is shown. However, not all applications share this ability, most notably, Apple's Notes app. I can type in phone numbers and addresses and names and the Notes app stores them for later reference, but that's it. I can't touch a name and have associated information appear from the address book, I can't touch a set of numbers and either bring up the phone or calculator, and web addresses do nothing when I touch them in Notes.

See what I mean? For every good thing is to talk about on the iPhone there's at least one comparable thing that's not quite so good.

And don't get me started on things that are missing altogether from Apple's uber-phone. Chief on many people's list is cut/copy/paste.

There is no explanation I've heard that satisfactorily answers the question of why this feature is not available on the iPhone yet. Less capable smart phones have this feature so it can't be that hard to do -- especially since the iPhone's operating system is a version of the same famed OS that runs Apple's Macs.

Another almost-there feature is Bluetooth. You can connect cellphone headsets, but you can't connect stereo bluetooth headsets. Why? You also can't connect other Bluetooth devices like keyboards. Again, the iPhone is running OS X, a tried and true OS with device drivers galore. We should be able to connect our iPhone to Bluetooth printers, speakers, and any other device we can think of. We can't and the only reason I can think of as to why we can't is that Apple, for some mysterious reason, thinks that's a low priority, too.

And speaking of what Apple doesn't want, what's up with kicking applications from the App Store because they compete directly with Apple products? Why should Apple care if a vendor attempts to out Apple Apple? It's healthy competition and, if anything, Apple should welcome it instead of banishing it.

Understand that I'm all for Apple keeping a close eye of the content of the App Store. Quality applications inspire other quality applications and Apple's offerings are usually a good yardstick to measure against, but Apple acting like a king in some Greek tragedy where it must keep a wary eye on any possible heirs to its throne is silly and diminishes the iPhone as a platform. This is especially important now that real iPhone competition is starting to appear.

Well, there I go whining. I really don't mean to, but it so frustrating to have a device that almost lives up to its promise, that almost does everything I need it to do, but in the end it is still almost.

No matter how you dice it, the iPhone is a powerful platform that has done a lot to shake up a stale cellphone industry, but the full potential of the iPhone has yet to be realized. I guess I want to realize it sooner than later, if you get my drift.


Vern Seward is a writer who currently lives in Orlando, FL. He's been a Mac fan since Atari Computers folded, but has worked with computers of nearly every type for 20 years.

Just a Thought Archives.

10 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

+ show options

Your current settings, click to change: Sort Oldest First, Show Guest Posts, Hide Community Stats

A guest said: (hide)

good title but inaccurate: the vine is vinegar and the cheese stinks but not of brie.

old and tired stuff...

Quote this post ↓

BlueGus said:

member since 18 Sep 2002 with 6 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

I, too, would like Cut and Paste, but I do understand why it's not yet implemented.

Yes, other phones have Cut and Paste, but no other phone is the iPhone. The touch interface is unique, not just among phones but among computing devices in general.

Implementing a shared pasteboard for data is easy. It's one of the basic principals of OS X, and would just as easily be added to the iPhone. But it's not the pasteboard that's taking so long, it's the way people activate it.

Should users tap and drag on text to copy? What about delete? And how should copy and paste work with non-text objects? Thing about all the things on the Mac that can be copied that *aren't* text. Command-C is easy. How do you do that on a phone?

No, the thing taking so long is that Apple hasn't come up with the best paradigm for Copy and Paste. They are fully aware that what they choose will not only be the standard on the iPhone, but likely picked up by other touch screen device manufacturers as well. Command-C, Command-X, and Command-V were all invented on a Mac and then copied by Windows. It's in Apple's best interest -- and the consumer's -- that they get this right. They don't want to claim that copy and paste is tap and drag today, then tomorrow change it to pinch and swipe.

I'm positive that in the Apple labs, they've probably got Copy and Paste implemented in over a dozen different ways. They just haven't perfected it yet, and they haven't decided which way is best. Once they do, you can be sure that they'll be adding it to the phone.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I have to agree with the just not quite there sentiment.

There are missing functions which really stump me as to why they are missing.

MMS messaging is, in Europe anyway, very popular and yet Apple does not allow this reasonably simple function to exist. I can't email a picture to my mates across the bar because they don't have email on their phone.

Text forwarding is another blunder, easy to implement but just not there.

Bluetooth data exchange, now I know music piracy is a concern but even allow the ability to send photos to other bluetooth phones.

The only saving grace is that Apple is updating the iphone very regularly, more than other phone manufactures and some day these functions will either be incorporated by Apple or through a third party application. Here's hoping anyway.

The thing for Apple to do is concentrate on these and other 'missing' functions and make the iphone as good as it can be and give us all less to whine about.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Seeeeriously, how many times have I read this elsewhere? Old and tired is right, dull dull dull. If you rewrote it five times then it's an even more colossal waste of time because other people have written almost exactly the same article what seems like a million times on other sites.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

"No compass headings" (whatever that is... perhaps you mean "course up" display - some applications might not make the most of the chipset)

"No copy and paste"

"Lacking Notes"

"Few Bluetooth accessories"

That was the best you could come up with? Lame and tired indeed.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

I find it ironic that all the folks complaining about your post being "old and tired" can't come up with any other way of describing it...

Quote this post ↓

VSeward said:

member since 28 Jun 2001 with 972 posts, TMO Staff, send him a message or view his profile

I rarely comment here though I do read what you all write. When I do comment I do it for clarification. I believe everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, and it doesn't bother me if you don't agree with mine. In fact, I think disagreeing is a good thing.

However, sometimes a bit more explanation may be in order for those who don't seem to understand something I've said. I think this is one of those times. The few examples I offered in my article were just that, examples, but some may not get the full ramification of the examples I picked.

FOR EXAMPLE: I mentioned Bluetooth and the lack of connectivity the iPhone has with Bluetooth devices other than cellphone headsets. I don't know about you, but I would much rather be untethered to my iPhone. I would sacrifice a bit of music fidelity (not a lot) for the convenience of being able to use a stereo Bluetooth headset with my iPhone. Further, I would love to be able to use a real keyboard on the occasion that I need one. In fact, I would like to be able to use both devices at once (with full understanding that my battery life would take a hit). Bluetooth to my home stereo instead of docking should be available as well as Bluetooth music to my car stereo. In fact, Bluetooth everywhere. That's what I want. Other devices can do it. I have a 4 year old Nokia N800 that runs a version of Linux and handles a Bluetooth keyboard and Bluetooth stereo headsets, and I believe it can do both at the same time. (I'll have to check to make sure.)

Now, imagine how much better the iPhone would be if you could listen to music in stereo without wires while typing out a note to your Aunt Mildred on a small Bluetooth keyboard, then catch a call, surf the Net to find some information, all at the same time. You can ALMOST do that, but not quite.

Do I really want to lug around a Bluetooth keyboard? No, but I might if I had the option to and if there were applications that would take advantage of touch typing.

And speaking of typing notes; another example of "almost" is the lack of landscape mode in email. Why allow landscape in some apps but not others, especially those that would benefit from a wider aspect? The void can be filled for $.99 with 2 apps (Wide Email and Touch Type Landscape), but I shouldn't have to pay $.99 for something that should have been there in the first place.

Anyway, look more closely at the examples I've sited or come up with some of your own, but the point remains: As nice as the iPhone is it still feels incomplete.

Ave A Gud'un,

Vern Seward

Quote this post ↓

gslusher said:

member since 13 Nov 2002 with 2088 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

"... it doesn't offer compass headings..."

That's a non-trivial function. What should the headings be based upon? If I understand correctly, a GPS receiver with a single antenna can't provide heading information by itself. It can provide velocity, but that is NOT the same as "heading," which would work even if the unit were stationary. (GPS receivers that provide heading or attitude information from GPS use multiple antennas. Most are not cheap and the antennas need to be something like 1 meter apart. That would be a bit inconvenient for a cell phone.)

The alternative would be a compass, which isn't that hard to do, though it does add hardware (another sensor). If the iPhone did have a compass, which axis of the iPhone would the heading be referred to? An iPhone is unlikely to be oriented in only one way to a car or even a person holding it. Most GPS heading receivers are designed for permanently-installed (or, at least, "fixed") antennas.

"...even true turn-by-turn navigation is missing."

As I recall, Apple has addressed that issue. There is a potential legal problem with turn-by-turn navigation: if the iPhone GPS led someone astray and an accident resulted, Apple could find itself in a huge lawsuit. Garmin, Magellan, etc., all have experience with that liability issue and are insured--Apple is not and doesn't want to get into that business. There may also be a problem with providing the maps--again, legal liability could rear its ugly and expensive head. (I doubt that Google maps are good enough. Google maps have tried to put me the wrong way on a one-way street several times and said that I should take an exit that didn't exist.) If I remember correctly, Apple has also prohibited developers from making a turn-by-turn navigation system. (They may be working with a company like Garmin or Magellan; it's NOT something a 3-person "company" should get involved in.)

Is there another cell phone that DOES have turn-by-turn navigation?

Quote this post ↓

art689 said:

member since 12 Oct 2008 with 1 posts, unranked, send him a message or view his profile

Couldn't agree more with the author. And he is, as he said, just touching on some examples. I find the same issue with some features in OSX in general, and very much with the Mac stores. When I ask "Why", I usually find myself defending myself, rather than engaging in a productive discussion. This, perhaps, is part of living in the "Mac World", and I am so disappointed, because it takes a lot of the enjoyment out of being involved with a Mac.

Why would anyone tolerate the issue of the cost of changing a battery, for an example. Apple's policies on this issue are shameful.

As to the iPhone, as much as I love the good things about it, I am seriously considering other options and the possibility of getting rid of mine. Some of my reasoning is based on some of what you have pointed out (in general), and some is based on what I perceive as poorer connectivity, compared to my other, more basic phones on the same number and ATT account for the past 4 years (I am comparing phone performance only, not the other features, which a lessor phone might not have). I am doing an informal test as I write this. I have moved my SIM to my old Moto flip phone for a week to compare dropped calls. Then I'll know, at least for myself.

And in spite of the updates, we don't seem to be reaching any conclusion. ATT points me to Apple, and Apple points me to ATT. That's another thing that didn't happen to me before.

Quote this post ↓

A guest said: (hide)

Vern and gslusher,

the iPhone does provide headings in more than one way and you don't need two antennas to get a heading.

Look for an application in the appstore called GPS Tracker and talking about headings, there is even a full blown marine chart plotter available called iNavX. Sometimes it just needs a little searching to find want you want.

Matthias Klemm

sailtheworld.de

Quote this post ↓

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.


Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.