Get Better Gear!

Premier Sponsors

TechRestore

Other World Computing

Top 5 Free Apps

Release Date: August 05, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: May 22, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: August 29, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: March 27, 2009
Release Date: August 07, 2009

iTunes New Music Releases

Release Date: September 29, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: September 20, 2009
Release Date: September 15, 2009
Release Date: August 25, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: August 25, 2009

Top 5 Paid Apps

Release Date: April 22, 2009
StickWars $0.99
Release Date: March 31, 2009
Genre: Games
Bloons $0.99
Release Date: April 05, 2009
Genre: Games

Discover New Music

  • How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb

    • 6 out of 10
    • U2
    • U2's latest entry is a mostly underwhelming collection of songs that does very little to sound any different from its equally pedestrian predecessor, 2000's "All That You Can't Leave Behind." While

  • Go Away White

    • 10 out of 10
    • Bauhaus
    • Go Away White is an album I've been waiting more than 20 years to hear, and the good news is that it was worth the wait.  The latest -- and last, no...for real this time -- album from

  • The Printz

    • 8 out of 10
    • Bumblebeez 81
    • Part white rap, part alternative, part pop, and part rock, the Bumblebeez grabbed a hold of me with "Pony Ride," and didn't let go.

      This group does a marvelous job of moving seamlessly be

  • Priest = Aura

    • 10 out of 10
    • The Church
    • Another of my all-time favorites, Priest = Aura is one of those rare albums where every song is simply fantastic, and a testament to how good pop-rock can be.

      Each song immediatel

  • 2112

    • 10 out of 10
    • Rush
    • We all know it, right? Well, ya just gotta have it. 2112 finally showed Rush out on their own, doing their own thing, and doing it well, IMHO.

Reader Specials

Visit Deals On The Web for the best deals on all consumer electronics, iPods, and more!

News

Internet Radio Negotiations Break Down

The potential demise of Internet radio in the United States has been an on again, off again thing for the past few months while SoundExchange and webcasters attempt to work out a music royalty payment scheme. The latest breakdown in negotiations has Internet broadcasters crying foul over demands that they find ways to add copy protection schemes to their music streams.

The negotiations stemmed from SoundExchange-proposed royalty payment hikes that the Copyright Royalty Board agreed to and enacted. The new fees work on a per-song basis, instead of the flat-fee schedule broadcasters had been paying before. The new payment plan was designed to be retroactive to the beginning of 2006, and in many cases amounts to more than revenue stations are bringing in.

SoundExchange, the RIAA’s royalty collection arm, and webcasters represented by the Digital Media Association (DiMA), have been working to reach an acceptable compromise. DiMA, however, chose to reject the latest SoundExchange proposal that includes caps on the minimum fees stations must pay for radio streams because it also includes verbiage that requires stations to come up with ways to prevent "streamripping," or the recording of station webcasts.

To take advantage of the payment cap, stations must agree to provide more detailed information about the music they are playing, and to "work to stop users from engaging in streamripping." DiMA representatives feel that the payment cap is being used to leverage webcasters into adding DRM copy protection to their music streams.

"DiMA and our members are happy to cooperate on issues of common interest even if outside the scope of the CRB decision, but SoundExchange has demanded enforceable technology mandates that are unreasonable, unworkable and way off-topic," said Jonathan Potter, Executive Director of the Digital Media Association. "They seek to leverage this absurd fee to impose mandates that they have unsuccessfully sought elsewhere."

While DiMA claims that streamripping is essentially a non-issue because it is easier for people to use P2P systems to download unlicensed copies of songs, SoundExchange disagrees. SoundExchange representatives see streamripping as a real threat that could dilute royalty revenue streams.

Both sides are now accusing each other of acting in bad faith and misrepresenting the facts, when only a week ago they appeared to be coming closer to an agreement. That near-agreement came during a roundtable meeting with the House Commerce Committee.

Should the negotiations break down completely, leaving the CRB ruling intact, most webcasters in the United States would likely shut down to avoid the new royalty rates.

Mr. Potter added "This is a disappointing turn after what we thought had been a very productive roundtable."

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me  Forgot your password?

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.