Get Better Gear!

Premier Sponsors

TechRestore

Other World Computing

Top 5 Free Apps

Release Date: August 05, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: May 22, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: August 29, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: March 27, 2009
Release Date: August 07, 2009

iTunes New Music Releases

Release Date: September 29, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: September 20, 2009
Release Date: September 15, 2009
Release Date: August 25, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: August 25, 2009

Top 5 Paid Apps

Release Date: April 22, 2009
StickWars $0.99
Release Date: March 31, 2009
Genre: Games
Bloons $0.99
Release Date: April 05, 2009
Genre: Games

Discover New Music

  • King James Version

    • 4 out of 10
    • Harvey Danger
    • The sophomore effort from Harvey Danger, I was really looking forward to this followup to "Where Have All the Merrymakers Gone?" Unfortunately, "King James Version" failed to deliver any of the bri

  • Quadrophenia

    • 10 out of 10
    • The Who
    • Quadrophenia is everything that Tommy wanted to be, a rock opera that told a story, but one where every song could still stand alone. It was also Pete Townshend's farewell tribute to the Mod

  • Playing the Angel

    • 8 out of 10
    • Depeche Mode
    • Oddly enough, Playing The Angel is a return to form for Depeche Mode, even though it may well be argued that they never truly deviated from their roots in their more recent offerings. In the

  • Trouble

    • 8 out of 10
    • Ray LaMontagne
    • At first, Ray LaMontagne might strike you as just another breathy-voiced knockoff of folk/rock guitarists like John Mayer and Jack Johnson. But he's actually got a better voice than either, he tell

  • Machine Gun Etiquette

    • 8 out of 10
    • The Damned
    • Punk rock is mostly associated with three chords and a bad attitude, but the Damned were one of the few bands of the era bent on bringing musicianship and a good sense of humor to the scene. And while

Reader Specials

Visit Deals On The Web for the best deals on all consumer electronics, iPods, and more!

News

Internet Radio Rejects SoundExchange Proposal

In an effort to appease Internet radio broadcasters rebelling against new royalty payment rates scheduled to go into effect in July, SoundExchange has offered a conditional settlement to the stations in hopes of getting the new payment plan back on track. Station owners aren’t pleased with the offer, but do see it as a starting point for negotiations.

The rate hikes that Internet broadcasters are upset about were approved by the Copyright Royalty Board after being pushed through by SoundExchange - the RIAA’s royalty collection arm. In many cases, the new payment rates will account for more money that the stations bring in, leaving them with the prospect of shuttering their businesses to avoid the costs.

Facing the possibility that U.S.-based Internet radio stations would likely shut down, bills to change the Copyright Royalty Board’s new rate ruling found their way into both the House and Senate. Broadcasters also banded together to take their battle into the court room.

SoundExchange has stepped forward with a proposal, but webcasters don’t think it goes far enough. SoundExchange is offering broadcasters that make less than US$1.2 million a year an extension of the previous deal until 2010. Once a broadcaster breaks through the $1.2 million ceiling, however, it will be retroactively liable for the CRB’s new pay per performance scheme and subject to payment terms that likely exceed its income.

"Although the rates revised by the CRB are fair and based on the value of music in the marketplace, there’s a sense in the music community and in Congress that small webcasters need more time to develop their businesses," said SoundExchange Executive Director John Simson.

David Oxenford, an attorney representing small commercial webcasters in the battle, told the Radio and Internet Newsletter "While the $1.2 million cap was fine in 2002 when it was used in the [Small Webcaster Settlement Act of 2002] negotiations, it doesn’t work in 2007. This would effectively limit the independent webcaster’s growth and investment opportunities, as who would invest in an entity with an absolute cap on their financial growth?"

One point of contention for SoundExchange is that it feels Internet radio stations are paying below-market rates for the music they play. The stations, however, were already paying between 10 and 12 percent of their annual gross income, and feel they were paying enough.

Since broadcasters and SoundExchange are on a fast track to the July deadline, and an in-court settlement would likely come after the date as well, it may be up to Congress to decide how this battle plays out - and whether or not Internet radio stations can afford to stay in business.

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me  Forgot your password?

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.