Get Better Gear!

Premier Sponsors

Other World Computing

TechRestore

Top 5 Free Apps

Release Date: August 05, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: May 22, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: August 29, 2009
Genre: Games
Release Date: March 27, 2009
Release Date: August 07, 2009

iTunes New Music Releases

Release Date: September 29, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: September 20, 2009
Release Date: September 15, 2009
Release Date: August 25, 2009
Genre: Rock
Release Date: August 25, 2009

Top 5 Paid Apps

Release Date: April 22, 2009
StickWars $0.99
Release Date: March 31, 2009
Genre: Games
Bloons $0.99
Release Date: April 05, 2009
Genre: Games

Discover New Music

  • Pretty Hate Machine

    • 8 out of 10
    • Nine Inch Nails
    • For years I wanted to make music that sounded like something between Love and Rockets and Ministry. In 1989, Trent Reznor beat me to it with this genre-defining album, and it smacked me upside the hea
  • So Jealous

    • 8 out of 10
    • Tegan and Sara
    • So Jealous is the third album from these sisters, and easily the one to single out for an introduction to their music. Some people may not get on board with their vocal styles, which are slightly

  • Spilt Milk

    • 10 out of 10
    • Jellyfish
    • The second and final album from this power-pop group makes me wish Jellyfish had been able to make just one more record together. The album is best enjoyed as a whole piece, flowing from one track to
  • Aretha Sings the Blues

    • 6 out of 10
    • Aretha Franklin
    • While she didn't always have the best taste in song selection, Aretha Franklin is a must-study for anyone with interest in the human voice. She has the kind of powerful, recklessly passionate deliv

  • Mezzanine

    • 6 out of 10
    • Massive Attack
    • "Black Milk" knocks me off my feet in this collection of moody and eclectic songs. Massive Attack uses samples and keyboards in a very unique way, but not all the songs pack the same punch.

Reader Specials

Visit Deals On The Web for the best deals on all consumer electronics, iPods, and more!

In-Depth Review

CellRanger Boosts iPhone Signal Bars, but it’s not a Panacea

The CellRanger is a wireless signal enhancer that can boost the number of bars you see on your iPhone in poor reception areas. However, simply increasing the number of bars isn't the whole story.

Description

The CellRanger, distributed by MOGO WIRELESS in Atlanta, GA, is a small device that connects to USB power on a PC or Mac and has an attached antenna. It's about the size of one of those car cigarette lighter adapters. In fact, a second version actually plugs into a car's cigarette lighter for power.

CellRanger Product

The basic idea is to receive cell phone signal in the 800 or 1900 MHz bands and retransmit it for your mobile phone, iPhone included.  It works with all carriers except Sprint/Nextel.

The 4-inch (10 cm) antenna is attached to a magnetic base for easy attachment to a car or boat. It can also be used in remote locations, such as when camping or at a house in a rural location with a poor signal.

Operation

I am one of those people who gets a marginal AT&T signal at our house, and my iPhone has been useless to marginal unless I leave the house. That's because we're in a slight topographic depression -- neighbors up the hill get a good signal. So I'm a prime candidate for a device like this.

In fact, I've tried several other makeshift solutions, some jury-rigged and some commercial and none have worked very well. The fundamental problem is that the iPhone doesn't have an antenna jack, and so proximity methods are required. (I have been told that GSM phones don't do well with antenna jacks, but I haven't been able to verify that claim.)

What's more, the idea of boosting the number of bars seen in the display, while attractive on the surface, isn't the whole story. In the past, I've described what's going on, and the canonical article on how the number of bars is calculated was written by Jacqui Cheng over at ars technica. The bottom line is that the number of bars displayed in a cell phone is not strictly a radio signal strength meter, but rather a complex calculation resulting in an estimate of your likelihood of completing a call.

Worse, in my testing of the device, I found that the number of bars is no guarantee of immunity from garbled or broken up voice. If the signal is weak to begin with, there will be dropouts. So the net result is that this device has its limits when it comes to very weak signals.

Testing

The CellRanger is the first and only device I've tested that can produce repeatable, improved results. That is, given that I have, for example, one bar without the device, I can demonstrate an improved number of bars simply by moving the cell phone close to the device. Pull it away, and the number of bars returns to the old state. This kind of repeatable, quantitative performance is very nice to see and gives one confidence that it really is working.

However, I encountered two problems. First, the manual says that the phone should be a few inches from the base unit. After some testing, I would say that the reality is that it needs to be a few centimeters from it. That means the dream of moving about my office while on AT&T remains distant. Instead, I jury-rigged a setup that combined a Just Mobile Xtand with the base unit so that when the iPhone is in the cradle, they almost touch. See the photos below.

Cell Ranger + Xtand

Cell Ranger + Xtand

The second problem is that I have virtually no AT&T signal anywhere in my house. Recently, I found one sweet spot in my office that allows for, basically, a crappy quality call, but at least I can get through. The CellRanger improved the situation from barely usable to poor. Even though, at times, I see five bars on the AT&T iPhone, that doesn't translate into a crisp call with no dropouts. I wouldn't depend on it to replace my land line, but at least I can start to use some of those 4,000+ rollover minutes that I've accumulated.

With iPhone Cradled

With iPhone Cradled

The situation with my T-Mobile phone is better. We get fair to good T-Mobile coverage where I live and the CellRanger is able to take a decent signal and give me four bars and a solid, drop-out free voice call. Again, four bars on the T-Mobile phone results is a higher quality call than four bars on the AT&T iPhone. Chalk it up to the mysteries of radio science and the algorithm described above.

Conclusion

What I liked about the unit was the quantitative, observable change in the number of signal bars displayed on my mobile phones. However, to get that advantage, I had to rig up an arrangement where the phone is very close to the base and either use the speakerphone or earbuds. With Apple's iPhone earbuds, the quality of my calls on T-Mobile is as good as a land line, and the AT&T iPhone 3GS now becomes usable when, before, it was not.

CellRanger on Window

Antenna At Top of Window

The USB powered or 12V powered version sells for $149.99. That's expensive, as devices like this go, but the payoff is that it actually does what it says it will do. My communications are improved, and I feel better about both my phones here in a rural area. That's good for now. At least until AT&T releases its femtocell/microcell Wi-Fi to 3G repeater for homes down the road. Presumably, at that point, I'll be able to make a call from anywhere in my house, and I can think about dropping T-Mobile.

Just The Facts

CellRanger from CellRanger

MSRP US$149.99

Pros:

Demonstrable, repeatable improvement in signal for mobile phones.

Cons:

Phone must be very close to base unit. Increase of very weak signal doesn't guarantee freedom from dropouts.

4 comments from the community.

You can post your own below.

Nick Batzdorf said:

Surely you’d get a lot of bars on the phone’s signal strength display whether or not the booster is delivering a useful signal.

   Quote

John Martellaro said:

I think it depends on how the unit is designed, but I’m guessing the weaker the local carrier signal, the truer that is.

-JM

   Quote

Stephen Swift said:

John, thanks for your review.  I had considered buying one, but after your review and link to the ars article, I think I have a better understanding of what’s going on with my iPhone.  My incoming signal is fine (I can always here the other line fine), but my signal back to the tower is weak (they have trouble hearing me).  So it doesn’t look like CellRanger would help me in this case.

For people who are interested, I was able to find them on ebay and other vendors for prices between $80-$100.

   Quote

Blackberry Bold Case said:

How is the recepetion/signal strength on the iphone 3G? A lot of people are telling me that it’s a lot worse than the original, because a lot of places where they used to get 4 bars with original they get 2 bars with the 3G and a lot of places where they used to get 2 or 3 bars have to no signal at all. Also I kniow for a fact that those places are 3G coverages. So is this true that the iPhone 3G signal strength/recpetion is worse than the original iphones?
Blackberry Bold Case

   Quote

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post Your Comments

  Remember Me  Forgot your password?

Not a member? Register now. You can post comments without logging in, but they'll show up as a "guest" post.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.